Answers to Frequently Asked Questions on the DOL Proposed Overtime Rule
September 23, 2023
Answers to Frequently Asked Questions on the DOL Proposed Overtime Rule

On Aug. 30, 2023, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced a proposed rule to amend current requirements employees in white collar occupations must satisfy to qualify for an overtime exemption under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).


The FLSA white collar exemptions apply to individuals in executive, administrative, professional, and some outside sales and computer-related occupations. Some highly compensated employees may also qualify for the FLSA white collar overtime exemption.


To qualify for this exemption, white collar employees must satisfy the standard salary level test, among other criteria. This salary level is a wage threshold that white collar employees must receive to qualify for the exemption.


The DOL is proposing to increase the standard salary level from:

  • $684 to $1,059 per week ($55,068 per year); and
  • $107,432 to $143,988 per year for highly compensated employees.


Action Steps

The proposal does not impose any new requirements on employers at this time. However, employers should become familiar with the proposed rule and evaluate what changes they may need to adopt if the rule is implemented as proposed.


OVERVIEW

1. What is the purpose of the Department’s proposed rule?

This rulemaking proposes to update and revise the regulations for determining whether certain white-collar salaried employees are exempt from minimum wage and overtime requirements under section 13(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Employees are exempt if they are employed in a bona fide executive, administrative, or professional (EAP) capacity as those terms are defined in the Department of Labor’s regulations at 29 CFR part 541. This exemption from the FLSA is sometimes referred to as the “white-collar” or “EAP” exemption.


2. What is “overtime?”

Unless specifically exempted, an employee covered by the FLSA must receive pay for hours worked in excess of 40 in a workweek at a rate not less than one and one-half their regular rate of pay. This is referred to as “overtime” pay.


3. What determines if an employee falls within the EAP exemption? 

Currently, to fall within the EAP exemption, an employee generally must: 


  1. Be paid a salary, meaning that they are paid a predetermined and fixed amount that is not subject to reduction because of variations in the quality or quantity of work performed (the “salary basis test”);
  2. Be paid at least a specified weekly salary level, which is $684 per week (the equivalent of $35,568 annually for a full-year employee) in the current regulations (the “salary level test”); and
  3. Primarily perform executive, administrative, or professional duties, as provided in the department’s regulations (the “duties test”). 


Certain employees are not subject to either the salary basis or salary level tests (for example, doctors, teachers, and lawyers).


4. When did the Department last revise the exemption regulations for EAP workers?

The Department last updated the EAP exemption regulations in 2019. That update, which included setting the standard salary level test at its current amount of $684 per week (equivalent to a $35,568 annual salary), has been in effect since January 1, 2020.


5. Why is the Department proposing to revise the exemption regulations for EAP workers?

The Department is committed to keeping the earnings thresholds up to date for the benefit of both workers and employers. Four years have passed since the 2019 rule, during which time salaried workers in the U.S. economy have experienced a rapid growth in their nominal wages, which lessens the effectiveness of the current salary level threshold. Through this rulemaking, the Department seeks to update the salary level test to more effectively identify who is employed in a bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity and ensure that the FLSA’s intended overtime protections are fully implemented.


In addition to updating the salary level to account for increased wages, the Department’s proposal would ensure that the salary level effectively performs its historic function of screening nonexempt employees from the overtime exemption and would more effectively account for the switch from a two-test to a one-test system.


6. What is the Department proposing to change about its exemption regulations for EAP workers?

In this rulemaking, the Department proposes to:


  • Increase the standard salary level to the 35th percentile of earnings of full-time salaried workers in the lowest-wage Census Region (currently the South), which would be $1,059 per week ($55,068 annually) based on current data;
  • Apply the standard salary level to Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and increase the special salary levels for American Samoa and the motion picture industry; 
  • Increase the highly compensated employee (HCE) total annual compensation requirement to the annualized weekly earnings of the 85th percentile of full-time salaried workers nationally, which would be $143,988 per year based on current data; and
  • Automatically update these earnings thresholds every 3 years with current wage data to maintain their effectiveness.


7. Is the Department proposing any changes to the current duties test?

The Department is not proposing changes to the standard duties test, consistent with its approach in both the 2016 and 2019 rules. At this time, the Department favors keeping the current standard duties test, which is well known to employers and employees. As long as it is paired with an appropriate salary level requirement, the standard duties test can appropriately distinguish bona fide EAP employees from nonexempt workers. 


8. Where can I review, and how can I comment on, the Department’s proposed changes to the exemption regulations for EAP workers?

The Department's Notice for Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”) is available at www.regulations.gov. The Department encourages all interested parties to participate in the rulemaking process by submitting written comments regarding the NPRM within 60 days from the publication date in the Federal Register. 


FLSA Basics

9. What does the FLSA do?

The FLSA establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and youth employment standards for employees in the private sector and in federal, state, and local governments. Covered nonexempt workers are entitled to a federal minimum wage of not less than $7.25 per hour. Overtime pay at a rate not less than one and one-half times the regular rate of pay is required after 40 hours of work in a workweek.


10. Who is covered by the FLSA?

Generally, employees of enterprises that have an annual gross volume of sales made or business done of $500,000 or more are covered by the FLSA. In addition, employees of certain businesses are covered by the FLSA regardless of the amount of gross volume of sales or business done. These businesses include hospitals; establishments providing medical or nursing care for residents; schools (whether operated for profit or not for profit); and public agencies. Employees of employers that are not covered by the FLSA on an enterprise basis may still be entitled to its protections if they are individually engaged in interstate commerce.


11. Does the FLSA and the Department’s proposed rule apply to state or local government workers?

Yes, state and local government employers are subject to the FLSA and the Department’s proposed regulations concerning EAP employees.


12. Is there a small business exemption from the FLSA or the Department’s proposed rule for EAP workers?

The FLSA does not provide an exemption for small businesses. Generally, the FLSA and the proposed rule apply to employees of enterprises that have an annual gross volume of sales made or business done of $500,000 or more, and certain other businesses. The FLSA creates a level playing field for businesses by setting a floor below which employers may not pay their employees.


13. Is there an exemption for nonprofit organizations from the FLSA or the Department’s proposed rule?

There is no exemption for nonprofit organizations under the FLSA or in the proposed rule. Thus, the proposed rule may impact nonprofit organizations that have an annual dollar volume of sales or business done of at least $500,000. In determining coverage, only activities performed for a business purpose are considered. Charitable, religious, educational, or similar activities of organizations operated on a nonprofit basis where such activities are not in substantial competition with other businesses are not considered. Employees of employers that are not covered by the FLSA on an enterprise basis may still be entitled to its protections if they are individually engaged in interstate commerce.


14. How is overtime pay determined?

Unless exempt, an employee covered by the FLSA must receive overtime pay for all hours worked over 40 in a workweek at a rate not less than one and one-half times their regular rate of pay. For guidance in determining an employee’s “regular rate of pay” when calculating overtime pay, refer to WHD Fact Sheet #56A or the Department’s regulations at 29 CFR part 778.


15. What is the FLSA’s EAP exemption?

Section 13(a)(1) of the FLSA exempts individuals employed in a “bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity” from the Act’s minimum wage and overtime requirements. Certain computer professionals and outside sales employees are included in the exemption and therefore excluded from the minimum wage and overtime requirements. The FLSA instructs the Department to issue regulations that define and delimit the EAP exemption; those regulations are located at 29 CFR part 541.


16. I'm paid a salary and my job title is manager. Am I exempt from overtime pay?

Job titles do not determine exempt status, and the fact that a white-collar employee is paid on a salary basis is not alone sufficient to exempt that employee from the FLSA’s minimum wage and overtime requirements. For an exemption to apply, an employee’s specific job duties and salary must meet all of the applicable requirements provided in the Department’s regulations.


17. What if a state has its own laws about who is entitled to overtime pay?

The FLSA provides minimum standards and does not preempt a state from establishing more protective standards. If a state establishes a more protective standard than the provisions of the FLSA, the higher standard applies in that state. This would include, for example, exemption criteria for EAP employees under state law with higher earnings thresholds than those provided in the Department’s federal regulations.


Earnings Thresholds

18. What are the current earnings thresholds needed for the EAP exemption?

Under the current regulations, an executive, administrative, or professional employee generally must be paid at least $684 per week (equivalent to $35,568 annually for a full-year employee) to be exempt from the FLSA overtime protections. This $684 per week threshold is the standard salary level. 


A computer professional may be exempt if they are paid at least $684 per week or at least $27.63 an hour, if paid on an hourly basis. 


There is no salary level test required to qualify as an exempt outside sales employee. Certain professionals including doctors, lawyers, and teachers are also not subject to the salary tests. 


Finally, the current regulations also contain a less restrictive duties test for certain highly compensated employees who receive total annual compensation of $107,432 or more and are paid at least $684 per week.


19. What is the proposed standard salary level?

The Department is proposing to set the standard salary level at the 35th percentile of weekly earnings of full-time salaried workers in the lowest-wage Census Region (the South). Using 2022 data, the proposed salary amount would equal $1,059 per week (which is $55,068 annually for a full-year worker). 


20. Why is the Department proposing to set the standard salary level at the 35th percentile of weekly earnings of full-time salaried workers?

In updating the standard salary level, the Department seeks to more effectively identify who is employed in a bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity. The proposal updates the standard salary level to account for earnings growth since the 2019 rule and adjusts the salary level methodology based on the lessons learned in recent rulemakings. 


21. What salary levels have the Department proposed to apply in U.S. territories?

This proposal would restore the Department’s longstanding policy prior to 2019 of only setting special lower salary levels for employees in those U.S. territories that are not subject to the full federal minimum wage (currently $7.25 per hour). Accordingly, the Department proposes to apply the standard salary level ($1,059 per week) to employees in Puerto Rico, where the federal minimum wage has applied since 1996; Guam, where the federal minimum wage has applied since at least 1957; the U.S. Virgin Islands, where the federal minimum wage has applied since 1989; and the CNMI, where the federal minimum wage has applied since 2018.


The Department proposes to set a special salary level for employees in American Samoa equal to 84 percent of the standard salary level ($890 per week, based on a proposed standard salary level of $1,059 per month), since American Samoa remains subject to special minimum wage rates below the federal minimum wage. American Samoa is scheduled to increase its minimum wage rates until they equal the federal minimum wage. The Department proposes that 90 days after the highest industry minimum wage for American Samoa equals the federal minimum wage, the full standard salary level would apply for all EAP employees in all industries in American Samoa.


22. Is the Department proposing to change the special base rate for employees in the motion picture industry?

The current regulations permit employers to exempt employees in the motion picture industry who are paid a specified base rate per week (or a proportionate amount based on the number of days worked), so long as they meet the duties test for the EAP exemption. Consistent with its practice in recent rulemakings, the Department proposes to increase the required base rate in proportion to the proposed increase in the standard salary level test, resulting in a proposed base rate of $1,617 per week (or a proportionate amount based on the number of days worked). 


23. Is the Department proposing to increase the salary level for highly compensated employees?

The Department is proposing to set the Highly Compensated Employee (HCE) annual compensation level equal to the 85th percentile of earnings for full-time salaried workers nationwide. Based on current data, the proposed HCE threshold would be $143,988 per year, of which at least $1,059 per week (the proposed standard salary level) would have to be paid on a salary or fee basis. The Department believes that its proposed methodology results in an HCE level that is low enough to not restrict the use of the HCE test for employers in low-wage regions and industries, and high enough to guard against the unintended exemption of workers who are not bona fide executive, administrative, or professional employees in higher-income regions and industries.


Future Updates

24. Does the proposed rule address future updates to the earnings thresholds provided in the EAP exemption regulations?

The Department is proposing a mechanism to automatically update the earnings thresholds every three years to ensure that they remain effective tests for exemption. If finalized, this proposal would ensure that the Department can timely and efficiently update the earnings thresholds in future years to reflect current wage data. Experience has shown that the salary level test is a strong measure of exempt status only when it is up to date. Left unchanged, the test becomes substantially less effective as wages for overtime-protected workers increase over time. Automatically updating the salary level and HCE total annual compensation requirement using the most recent data will ensure that these tests continue to accurately reflect current economic conditions.


25. How is the Department proposing to automatically update the salary level and HCE total compensation levels?

The Department is proposing to update the standard salary level and the HCE total compensation requirement every three years to reflect current earnings data. Specifically, the Department is proposing to update the standard salary level by adjusting it to remain at the 35th percentile of weekly earnings of full-time nonhourly workers in the lowest-wage Census Region (currently the South). The Department is proposing to update the HCE total annual compensation requirement to remain at the annualized weekly earnings of the 85th percentile of full-time nonhourly workers nationally. The Department proposes to update both of these thresholds using the most recent available four quarters of data, as published by BLS, preceding the publication of the Department’s notice to automatically update the thresholds.


Because the proposed special salary level for American Samoa and the base rate for the motion picture industry are set in relation to the standard salary level, those earnings thresholds would also reset at the time the standard salary level is updated. At least 150 days before the date of the update of the standard salary level and the HCE total annual compensation requirement, the Department would publish in the Federal Register a notice with the new earnings levels described above.


26. Does the proposed rule include any special exceptions where the earnings thresholds would not be automatically updated?

The Department’s proposal includes a provision allowing the Department to temporarily delay a scheduled automatic update where unforeseen economic or other conditions warrant. This feature would afford the Department added flexibility to adopt to unforeseen circumstances without sacrificing the benefits provided by automatic updating.


Impact

27. What are the estimated costs, benefits, and transfers of the proposed rule?

The Department estimates that in Year 1, the proposed rule would impose $1.2 billion of direct costs on employers, including $427.2 million in regulatory familiarization costs, $240.8 million in adjustment costs, and $534.9 million in managerial costs. The Department estimates that the proposed rule would result in a Year 1 income transfer of $1.2 billion from employers to employees, predominantly from new overtime premiums, or pay raises to maintain the exempt status of some affected employees. Beyond these wage transfers, the proposal could reduce the risk of misclassification, increase worker productivity, reduce employee turnover, and increase personal time for workers. 


28. How many employees would be impacted by the proposed salary level increase?

In the first year, the Department estimates that 3.4 million workers exempt under the current regulations who earn at least the current weekly salary level of $684 but less than the proposed salary level of $1,059 would, without some intervening action by their employers, become newly entitled to overtime protection under the FLSA. 


Similarly, the Department estimates that an additional 248,900 workers who earn at least $107,432 per year (the current HCE total annual compensation level) and who meet the minimal HCE duties test but not the standard duties test, would, without some intervening action by employers, become eligible for overtime if the HCE total annual compensation level were increased to the proposed level of $143,988 per year. 



Source: U.S. Department of Labor – Frequently Asked Questions for the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Defining and Delimiting the Exemptions for Executive, Administrative, Professional, Outside Sales, and Computer Employees

Sign up for our newsletter.

Hosting a Graduation Party or Summer BBQ? What Upstate NY Homeowners Should Know About Liability

June 5, 2026
June in Upstate New York has a way of bringing everyone outside. Graduation parties fill backyards, grills get fired up, pools open for the season, and weekends start revolving around family, friends, neighbors, and good weather. Most homeowners think about the fun parts of hosting: food, seating, parking, decorations, and whether the weather will cooperate. Insurance is usually not at the top of the checklist. But when you invite people onto your property, you also take on a certain level of responsibility for their safety. That does not mean you should be afraid to host. It simply means it is worth understanding how liability works, where common risks show up, and when it may be a good idea to review your homeowners insurance before summer gatherings begin. What does liability mean for homeowners? Liability, in the context of homeowners insurance, generally refers to your financial responsibility if someone is injured or their property is damaged and you are found legally responsible. For example, a guest could trip on uneven patio stones, fall on a wet pool deck, get bitten by a dog, or be injured during a backyard game. In some situations, the liability portion of a homeowners policy may help with expenses such as legal defense costs, settlements, or medical-related claims, depending on the details of the situation and the terms of the policy. Every policy is different, and coverage depends on the facts of the claim. Still, liability coverage is one of the most important parts of a homeowners policy, especially for people who regularly host guests. Summer gatherings can create more exposure than homeowners realize A typical backyard party may feel casual, but from an insurance perspective, there are a lot of moving pieces. Guests may be walking through your yard, driveway, garage, deck, patio, or pool area. Children may be running around. People may be using stairs, outdoor furniture, grills, fire pits, trampolines, or playsets. If alcohol is served, the level of responsibility can become even more complicated. In Upstate NY, summer entertaining often includes properties with larger yards, older homes, uneven walkways, detached garages, rural driveways, lake access, pools, docks, or recreational vehicles. These features can make a home a wonderful place to gather, but they can also create risks that should be managed thoughtfully. The key question is not, “Could something go wrong?” The better question is, “Have I taken reasonable steps to make the property safe, and do I understand what my insurance may or may not cover?” Common hosting risks to think about before guests arrive Some risks are easy to overlook because they are part of everyday life at home. A loose step you have learned to avoid may not be obvious to a first-time guest. A dog that is comfortable around your family may react differently in a crowded backyard. A pool that feels routine to you may be a major attraction for children at a party. Before hosting, it is worth walking your property the way a guest would. Look for uneven walkways, loose railings, poor lighting, wet surfaces, cluttered stairs, exposed extension cords, unstable outdoor furniture, or areas where children could wander unsupervised. If you have a pool, trampoline, fire pit, grill, pond, dock, or other attractive feature, think carefully about supervision and access. These are often the areas where accidents happen quickly. You don't need to make your home perfect. But taking a few practical steps before a party can reduce the chance of injury and help show that you took safety seriously. Alcohol adds another layer of responsibility Many graduation parties, BBQs, and summer gatherings include alcohol. For hosts, this is an area where caution matters. New York has laws that can create consequences for providing alcohol to minors. Even beyond legal concerns, alcohol can increase the chance of falls, arguments, poor decisions, or unsafe driving after a party. If alcohol will be served, hosts should think about how it will be monitored, especially at graduation parties where underage guests may be present. Keep alcohol in a controlled area, avoid self-serve access for minors, and consider having non-alcoholic options readily available. It is also wise to pay attention to guests who may need a ride or should not be driving. This is not just a legal issue. It is a safety issue, a community issue, and potentially an insurance issue. Are pools, trampolines, and backyard features covered? Many homeowners assume that if something is on their property, it is automatically covered under their policy. That is not always the case. Certain features, such as pools, trampolines, diving boards, treehouses, docks, or recreational equipment, may need to be disclosed to your insurance carrier. Some companies have specific eligibility rules, safety requirements, exclusions, or underwriting guidelines around these risks. For example, an insurer may want to know whether a pool is fenced, whether a trampoline has a safety net, or whether there are certain structures on the property. If your home has changed since your policy was written, your coverage may not reflect your current situation. This is one reason a summer insurance review can be so valuable. If you added a pool, built a deck, installed a fire pit, bought a trampoline, added a dog, or started hosting more often, it may be time to check in with your agent. Why your liability limit matters Homeowners insurance policies include liability limits. That limit is the maximum amount the policy may pay for a covered liability claim, subject to the policy terms. The challenge is that serious injuries can become expensive quickly. Medical bills, legal fees, lost wages, and settlement costs can add up, especially if an accident results in long-term injury. Many homeowners have not looked at their liability limit in years. Some may have selected a limit when they first bought the home and never revisited it. But life changes. Home values change. Assets change. Families grow. Teen drivers, pets, pools, boats, camps, and frequent entertaining can all change your overall risk picture. A higher homeowners liability limit may be available, and some households may also benefit from a personal umbrella policy. When an umbrella policy may be worth discussing A personal umbrella policy provides additional liability protection above the limits of certain underlying policies, such as homeowners, auto, or recreational vehicle insurance. It is designed for larger liability claims where the underlying policy limit may not be enough. For summer hosts, an umbrella policy can be especially worth discussing if you have a pool, own a boat or recreational vehicle, have teen drivers, entertain often, own a rental or seasonal property, or simply want additional protection for your assets. Umbrella coverage is not a replacement for a homeowners policy. It works alongside eligible underlying policies, and it has its own terms, limits, and exclusions. But for many households, it can be a practical way to strengthen their overall protection. Do renters and condo owners need to think about liability too? Yes. Liability is not just a concern for traditional homeowners. If you rent a home or apartment and host friends for a summer gathering, renters insurance may include personal liability coverage. If you own a condo or townhouse, your condo policy may include liability coverage as well. However, the details can vary, and shared spaces may introduce additional considerations. For example, if a guest is injured inside your rented apartment, on your balcony, or in an area you are responsible for maintaining, your policy may come into play. If the injury occurs in a common area, the situation may involve the landlord, property owner, HOA, or condo association. The main point is simple: if you host guests, liability coverage is worth understanding, regardless of whether you own a house. A few simple steps before your next gathering Before your next graduation party, BBQ, pool day, or backyard get-together, take a little time to prepare your property. Make sure walkways are clear, stairs are well lit, railings are secure, and outdoor areas are free of obvious hazards. Keep pets separated if they may become overwhelmed. Supervise pools and play areas. Be thoughtful about alcohol, especially when minors are present. Check that grills, fire pits, and extension cords are placed safely. It is also smart to review your homeowners, renters, or condo insurance before hosting season gets into full swing. Ask about your liability limit, medical payments coverage, any exclusions that may apply, and whether an umbrella policy makes sense for your household. Hosting should feel enjoyable, not stressful Summer gatherings are part of what makes this season special in Upstate NY. Whether you are celebrating a graduate, inviting neighbors over for a cookout, or opening the pool for the first time, a little preparation can go a long way. Insurance may not be the most exciting part of party planning, but it can be one of the most important. Understanding your liability coverage helps you host with more confidence, protect your guests, and avoid surprises if something unexpected happens. Before the guests arrive, take a few minutes to look around your property and review your coverage. It is a small step that can make a big difference. If you are unsure whether your current policy fits your summer plans, our Personal Insurance Team at Simco Insurance & Wealth Management can help you review your options and understand what coverage may make sense for you and your family.

5 Questions to Ask About Your 401(k) Administration Process

May 15, 2026
For many employers, managing a 401(k) plan has become more time-consuming than expected. What should feel like a straightforward administrative process often turns into ongoing coordination between payroll systems, retirement providers, HR teams, and compliance partners. The challenge usually is not the retirement plan itself. More often, the friction comes from the systems and processes supporting it. Manual uploads, delayed updates, repeated reconciliation work, and disconnected data flows can quietly create extra administrative burden over time. Because these issues develop gradually, many organizations begin treating them as “just part of the process.” But they do not have to be. As retirement administration continues to evolve, employers are taking a closer look at the operational side of their plans and asking whether their current processes are truly efficient, scalable, and aligned. Here are five questions worth asking about your organization’s 401(k) administration process. 1. Are We Still Manually Uploading Payroll Files? One of the most common inefficiencies in retirement administration is still surprisingly widespread: manually extracting payroll data and uploading files from one system to another every pay period. While this process may seem manageable, it creates unnecessary administrative work and introduces opportunities for error. Payroll teams often spend time formatting files, validating contribution data, and confirming whether updates were successfully processed. Over time, those extra steps add up. Modern payroll integrations can automate much of this process by securely transferring contribution, eligibility, and employee census data directly between systems. That reduces repetitive manual work while helping ensure retirement information stays current and accurate. If your team still relies heavily on manual uploads each pay cycle, it may be worth evaluating whether your current process is creating more administrative lift than necessary. 2. How Many Systems Need to Be Checked to Confirm an Update Went Through? This is where many employers begin to feel the operational strain of disconnected systems. An employee updates their deferral amount. A payroll change is processed. A loan repayment adjustment is made. Then someone has to verify whether the update actually flowed correctly between platforms. In environments where systems are not fully connected, HR and payroll teams often become the “checkpoint” between vendors, manually confirming updates and troubleshooting discrepancies after the fact. This is also where the difference between one-way and two-way integrations becomes important. A one-way, or 180° integration, typically sends payroll information outward to the retirement provider but does not automatically sync updates back into the payroll or HCM system . A two-way, or 360° integration, allows updates to move between systems automatically, helping reduce duplicate work and missed changes. The less time teams spend double-checking systems, the more time they can spend supporting employees and broader business priorities. 3. Could We Easily Pull Accurate Data for Compliance Testing and Reporting? Retirement plans operate within a highly regulated environment, and compliance depends heavily on accurate, timely data. Annual testing and reporting often require employers to provide detailed information including compensation data, contribution amounts, hire dates, demographic information, eligibility records, and more. For organizations using disconnected systems, collecting that information can become a time-intensive process. Missing fields, outdated data, or formatting inconsistencies often lead to repeated file requests and last-minute corrections during annual testing periods. This creates stress not only for HR and payroll teams, but also for plan administrators, TPAs, and recordkeepers responsible for maintaining compliance standards. Integrated payroll and retirement systems help streamline this process by automatically capturing and syncing data throughout the year, improving visibility and reducing the need for manual data gathering when reporting deadlines approach. 4. How Much Time Is HR Spending Fixing Preventable Errors? Many retirement administration issues do not start as major problems. More often, they begin as small discrepancies that require manual follow-up, whether it is a contribution that does not align with payroll data, an incorrect eligibility date, a delayed deferral update, or an incomplete census file. On their own, these issues may seem relatively minor. Over time, however, they create a significant amount of reactive work for HR and payroll teams that are left validating information, correcting inconsistencies, and coordinating between systems and providers. What makes this especially frustrating is that many of these issues are preventable. They are often the result of disconnected systems, delayed synchronization, or processes that rely too heavily on manual intervention. When teams spend large portions of their time validating data, reconciling discrepancies, and coordinating between providers, it becomes harder to focus on strategic priorities like employee engagement, workforce planning, and benefits strategy. Reducing friction behind the scenes can have a meaningful impact on both operational efficiency and the employee experience. 5. Is Our Current Process Built to Scale as We Grow? Processes that work for a smaller workforce can quickly become difficult to manage as an organization grows. More employees mean more payroll activity, more contribution data, more eligibility tracking, and more opportunities for inconsistencies across systems. Without connected infrastructure, administrative complexity tends to grow alongside headcount. That is why many employers are reevaluating whether their current retirement administration processes are sustainable long term. The goal is not simply to “manage” the workload, but to create systems that scale efficiently without increasing manual effort at the same pace. Connected payroll, HR, and retirement systems can help organizations reduce administrative burden, improve accuracy, and create a more streamlined experience for both employers and employees. A More Connected Approach to Retirement Administration A well-run 401(k) plan should not require constant oversight to function smoothly. When payroll, HR, and retirement administration systems work together, organizations gain better visibility into data, fewer manual touchpoints, improved reporting efficiency, and greater confidence in their processes overall. At Simco , we help employers simplify workforce management by aligning payroll, HR, benefits, and retirement administration through more connected systems and support models. For organizations evaluating their current retirement administration process, sometimes the most valuable first step is simply asking the right questions. Looking Ahead Retirement administration will likely continue becoming more data-driven, integrated, and compliance-focused in the years ahead. Employers that take time now to evaluate how information flows between payroll, HR, and retirement systems will be better positioned to reduce operational friction, support employees more effectively, and scale with greater confidence over time.

Finger Lakes Homeowners: Is Your Insurance Ready for Spring and Summer Storms?

April 27, 2026
Living in the Finger Lakes, especially throughout Canandaigua and Ontario County, offers a quality of life that is hard to match. The lakes, the landscape, and the changing seasons are part of what makes this area special. Those same characteristics, however, also create very specific risks to your home and property. Many of these risks are not fully understood until a loss occurs. This overview is meant to help bring clarity before that happens. Heavy Rain and Flooding: A Common Misunderstanding Spring in our region often brings a combination of heavy rainfall and saturated ground, sometimes alongside lingering snowmelt. When the ground can no longer absorb water, it finds its way into basements and lower levels. What many homeowners do not realize: • Standard homeowners insurance does not cover flood damage • Sewer or drain backup coverage is not automatically included • Even minor water intrusion can result in significant repair costs Flooding remains one of the most common and misunderstood gaps in coverage. Summer Storms and Wind Damage Severe weather events have become more frequent and more intense in recent years. Across the Finger Lakes, we regularly see: • Trees falling onto homes or structures • Roof and siding damage from high winds • Power surges impacting appliances and electronics While many of these losses are typically covered, there are important considerations: • Tree removal coverage is often limited • Poorly maintained trees can create complications in claims • Deductibles may be higher than expected, especially for wind-related losses Tornado Activity in Upstate New York Tornadoes are not something most people associate with our region, but they do happen in upstate New York. They are often smaller in scale, but still strong enough to damage roofs, garages, sheds, outbuildings, and surrounding property. In many cases, tornado-related damage is covered under a standard homeowners policy. The bigger concern is whether homeowners have reviewed their limits, deductibles, and property details before a loss occurs. Hail Damage: Often Overlooked Hail damage does not always present itself immediately. Over time, it can: • Compromise roofing materials • Reduce the lifespan of your roof • Lead to leaks or structural issues later on An important detail many homeowners are unaware of: some policies now settle roof claims based on actual cash value rather than full replacement cost, which can significantly reduce claim payouts. Lakefront and Hillside Exposures The natural features that define the Finger Lakes also introduce unique risks: • Shoreline erosion • Slope instability • Ground shifting following heavy rain It is important to understand: • Land itself is not insurable • Earth movement, including landslides, is typically excluded These are among the most significant uncovered exposures in our area. Lightning and Power Surges A single storm can damage electronics, appliances, and home office equipment. While coverage may apply, it is often subject to policy limits, deductibles, and specific conditions. If you work from home or rely on expensive electronics, it is worth reviewing how your policy handles power surge damage before you need to file a claim. What Homeowners Often Learn Too Late After working through claims with families across the region, a consistent pattern emerges: “I thought that was covered.” “No one explained that to me.” “I wish I had reviewed this sooner.” Insurance is not just about having a policy in place. It is about understanding how that policy responds in real-world situations. A Local Approach to Reviewing Your Coverage As part of the Finger Lakes community, we believe homeowners should have a clear understanding of their coverage before they need to rely on it. We offer straightforward, no-pressure coverage reviews that include: • A clear explanation of your current policy • Identification of potential gaps based on local risks • Honest answers to your questions • Guidance on whether any adjustments make sense for your situation Looking Ahead Seasonal weather in the Finger Lakes is predictable in one sense: it will come. The better question is whether your coverage reflects the realities of where you live. Taking the time to review now can help ensure you are prepared when it matters most.

Have a question? Get in touch.