Offering a 401(k) plan is an important part of a competitive benefits package, but simply having a retirement plan in place does not necessarily mean it is delivering the value you intended. A strong retirement plan should support both sides of the relationship. For employees, it should make saving for the future accessible, understandable, and manageable. For employers, it should support broader goals around recruitment, retention, financial wellness, and overall employee experience.
Retirement plan participation has made significant progress in recent years. Vanguard's 2026 How America Saves report found that participation among eligible employees reached a record 86%, up from 65% when the study began 25 years ago. Vanguard points to improvements in plan design, including automatic enrollment, stronger default contribution rates, and employer support, as important drivers of that progress.
For employers, that raises a useful question: Is your current retirement plan doing everything it could for your workforce? Here are seven areas worth reviewing.
1. Are Employees Actually Participating?
Start with one of the simplest measures: how many eligible employees are using the plan? A retirement benefit can be well-designed on paper but have limited impact if a meaningful portion of the workforce never enrolls.
Look beyond the overall participation rate and consider whether certain groups are participating less than others. New hires, younger employees, lower-paid employees, or particular departments may have different engagement levels.
Low participation does not always mean employees are uninterested. Sometimes the issue is simply that enrollment feels complicated, information is unclear, or employees continue putting off a decision.
2. Are Employees Saving Enough to Make Participation Meaningful?
Participation alone does not tell the entire story. An employee contributing a very small percentage of pay is technically participating, but may still be far from building the savings they need for retirement. Employers can review broader plan trends such as average contribution rates, how many employees are contributing enough to receive the full employer match, and whether participants tend to increase their savings over time.
The goal is not for employers to determine how much any individual employee should save. Rather, it is to understand whether the plan's structure and communication are encouraging employees to take meaningful steps toward long-term financial security.
3. Is Your Employer Match Accomplishing What You Intended?
Employer contributions can be one of the most visible and valuable parts of a retirement benefit. But it is worth periodically asking why your organization offers a match and whether the current structure still supports that objective.
Is the goal to encourage higher savings? Strengthen recruitment and retention? Provide a more competitive benefits package? Support employee financial wellness?
Employees should also understand how the match works. If participants are regularly contributing below the level required to receive the full employer contribution, that may indicate an opportunity for clearer education or communication.
4. Does Your Plan Make Saving Easy?
One of the biggest changes in retirement planning over the past several decades has been the shift toward plan designs that make saving easier. Vanguard's 2026 research found that nearly two-thirds of plans with automatic enrollment now use a default contribution rate of at least 4%, while approximately one-third default participants at 6%. Features such as automatic enrollment and automatic contribution increases can help reduce the need for employees to make every decision on their own.
Employers may also want to consider the everyday participant experience:
- Is enrollment straightforward?
- Is it easy to change a contribution rate?
- Can employees access their accounts without unnecessary friction?
- Are payroll deductions processed consistently?
- Can participants easily update beneficiaries or review plan information?
Small barriers can have an outsized impact on whether employees actively engage with the benefit.
5. Do Employees Understand Their Retirement Benefit?
Employees cannot fully value a benefit they do not understand. Retirement plans can involve unfamiliar terminology around contribution types, employer matches, vesting, investment options, distributions, and other plan features. For employees who are new to retirement saving, that information can quickly become overwhelming.
Consider whether employees clearly understand:
- How to enroll
- How much the employer contributes, if applicable
- How the employer match works
- How to change their contribution
- Where to find plan information
- Who to contact when they have questions
Retirement education also should not necessarily end after onboarding. Employees' questions and priorities change as their careers, compensation, and personal circumstances evolve. Clear, ongoing communication can help employees make more informed decisions and better appreciate the benefit their employer is providing.
6. Does the Plan Support Employees at Different Career Stages?
A workforce rarely has one set of retirement needs. An employee just beginning their career may need help understanding why starting early matters. A mid-career employee may be balancing retirement savings with housing, childcare, or other financial priorities. Someone approaching retirement may have entirely different questions about contribution opportunities, account management, and the transition out of the workforce. A strong retirement benefit should be able to support employees across those different stages. That may include thoughtful plan design, educational resources, appropriate investment options, access to professional guidance, and communication that goes beyond a one-size-fits-all approach.
7. Does the Plan Still Fit Your Business?
Retirement plans should evolve alongside the organizations that sponsor them. Your workforce may be larger than it was when the plan was established. Your recruiting strategy may have changed. Employees may now work across multiple states. Your internal HR or payroll team may have different capacity. Your compensation structure or benefits philosophy may have evolved. Those changes can all be reasons to revisit the current retirement plan.
For some employers, an existing traditional 401(k) may remain the best fit. Others may benefit from changes to plan design, investment support, administrative structure, or a different retirement solution altogether, such as a Pooled Employer Plan (PEP). The goal is not to change a retirement plan simply for the sake of changing it. It is to periodically confirm that the plan still aligns with the needs of both the organization and its employees.
A Retirement Plan Should Do More Than Exist
A 401(k) plan is more than an administrative requirement or another line on a benefits summary. When structured thoughtfully, it can become a meaningful part of the employee experience and an important tool for attracting, retaining, and supporting a workforce.
Employers should periodically look beyond whether the plan is functioning and ask a bigger question: Is it producing the experience and outcomes we want for our people and our business? That review may include participation, savings behavior, employer contributions, employee education, plan design, investment support, and whether the overall structure still fits the organization.
At Simco, we help employers evaluate retirement solutions based on their individual goals, workforce, and business needs. From traditional retirement plans to options such as the Simco PEP, our approach is focused on helping employers understand their choices and determine which structure makes the most sense for their organization.
If it has been a while since your retirement plan was evaluated beyond its day-to-day administration, now may be a good time to take a closer look.
Sign up for our newsletter.





