Wage and Hour Case Studies - Today's DOL Violation Trends
September 28, 2022
Wage and Hour Case Studies - Today's DOL Violation Trends

The U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division (WHD) is tasked with enforcing employment laws that affect more than 148 million workers. The WHD enforces federal minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping and child labor requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), as well as the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and a number of other employment standards and worker protections. According to the DOL, the core enforcement obligations of the WHD’s investigators include conducting investigations to determine if employers are paying workers and affording them their rights as required by law; helping ensure that law-abiding employers are not undercut by employers who violate the law; promoting compliance through outreach and public education initiatives; and supporting efforts to combat worker retaliation and worker misclassification as independent contractors. In fiscal year 2021, the WHD collected $230 million in wages owed to 190,000 workers, the DOL reported.


Generally, the WHD will initiate an investigation after a current or former employee files a complaint. A WHD investigator may visit an employer to provide information about the application of and compliance with the laws administered

by the WHD. An investigator may also visit an organization to conduct interviews, examine time clocks and ensure all employment notifications are available to employees. Additionally, they may review up to three years of wage and hour records to determine whether there are any violations in an employer’s payroll practices.


In addition to complaints, the WHD selects certain businesses and industries for investigation. For example, the WHD often targets low-wage industries due to high rates of violations, the employment of vulnerable workers or rapid industry changes, such as growth or decline. Occasionally, several organizations in a specific geographic area will be examined.


At the start of 2022, the DOL announced an initiative to hire 100 additional WHD investigators, signaling a potential increase in enforcement in 2022 and beyond. This initiative means now is the time for employers to review their wage and hour practices to ensure compliance with all relevant laws.


This article contains case studies that explore the most recent, real-world examples of employers found to be in violation of wage and hour laws. The case studies include snapshots of violations and general guidance on how employers can prevent similar issues. Employers can examine these case studies to learn from the mistakes of others in comparable industries and avoid costly consequences.


Real-world Case Studies


TAMPA, FL—A DOL investigation uncovered child labor violations by a fast-food restaurant franchisee. The franchisee had to pay more than $12,000 in civil monetary penalties.


What went wrong:

  • The organization allowed 17 employees who were minors—between ages 14 and 15—to work past 7 p.m.
  • The organization also allowed minor employees to work more than three hours during a school day when doing so was not permitted.


----------------       

ROCHESTER, NY—A DOL investigation found that a health care agency failed to pay its home health care aids overtime wages. The organization was forced to pay more than $228,000 in back wages for the 260 affected workers.


What went wrong:

  • Although the organization paid its health care aids overtime for hours worked over 44, it failed to pay workers time-and-a-half wages for hours between 40 and 44 they worked per week.


----------------       


NEW ORLEANS—A DOL investigation discovered that two contractors misclassified their painters and drywall workers as independent contractors. The organizations were forced to pay more than $246,000 in back wages for 306 workers.


What went wrong:

  • One organization misclassified its workers as independent contractors.
  • The same organization also failed to pay workers time-and-a-half overtime wages after they exceeded 40 hours in a workweek and instead used their regular rate of pay.
  • Both organizations failed to maintain complete and accurate records of the hours their employees worked.
  • The DOL determined that a joint employment relationship existed between the two organizations and, as a result, they were both liable to pay back wages.


 ----------------           

ATLANTA—A DOL investigation found that the Georgia Department of Public Health wrongly disciplined and terminated an employee for absences protected under the FMLA. The department was ordered to pay more than $77,000 in back wages and reinstate the employee.


What went wrong:

  • The department denied the employee’s request for leave for an FMLA-qualified condition.
  • The employee’s denial of FMLA benefits resulted in wrongful discipline and subsequent termination.


  ----------------   


Avoiding Violations

As illustrated by the case studies, avoiding wage and hour violations isn’t always easy. Due to the complex nature of employment laws, compliance is an ongoing challenge for employers. Reviewing these laws and regulations infrequently or only a handful of times is rarely sufficient, but by reviewing these laws regularly, employers can keep their businesses compliant and their workers satisfied. Below is general guidance related to the issues discussed earlier, categorized by violation type.


Child Labor Violations

Hiring minors comes with greater employer responsibilities, as minors have a number of specific wage and hour protections. Failing to comply with laws protecting this worker segment can be particularly costly.


The DOL recently publicized investigations uncovering child labor law violations. The WHD’s recent investigations of three grocery store operators in Idaho and Oregon resulted in more than $240,000 in civil penalties and $114,382 in unpaid overtime and liquidated damages for 266 employees. From 2017 to 2021, the DOL identified more than 4,000 cases of child labor law violations, finding more than 13,000 youth-aged workers employed in a violation.


In the Tampa, Florida, case study detailed in this article, minors were allowed to work later and more often than permitted by law. All of these instances are violations of the child labor provisions of the FLSA. Perhaps this was due to a shortage of workers, and only minors were available for specific positions and hours. Despite challenges in the current labor market, employers must remain compliant with all relevant state and federal laws governing child labor.


Employers should also consider regularly consulting with attorneys to ensure policies and practices are up to date and compliant.


Overtime Violations

The FLSA requires employers to pay covered nonexempt employees overtime wages—at a rate of time-and-a-half—if they exceed 40 hours in a workweek. Some companies utilize a variety of tactics to avoid paying these wages, including those that are unlawful.


In this article’s Rochester, New York, case study, the health care agency maintained and followed a practice in which home health care aids were paid straight time until they had worked more than 44 hours in a week. However, these employees were eligible for overtime pay once they had worked more than 40 hours. This case study demonstrates the importance of properly constructed and regularly reviewed workplace policies and manager training. Consulting with experts and having them review policies prior to their enforcement could save employers tens of thousands of dollars down the line. According to the DOL, employers may also contact the WHD to ensure they understand their responsibilities and avoid similar violations.


Employee Misclassification

One of the most serious problems facing employers is the misclassification of employees as independent contractors. Under the FLSA, employees are entitled to basic workplace protections that do not extend to independent contractors, such as minimum wage, overtime pay, protected FMLA leave, antidiscrimination and antiretaliation protections, workers’ compensation and unemployment insurance. The WHD is responsible for determining whether an employee has been misclassified as an independent contractor. Employers who misclassify workers may be forced to pay back wages, liquidated damages, attorneys’ fees and costs.


In the New Orleans, Louisiana, case study examined in this article, one contractor misclassified its workers as independent contractors. The workers were paid straight-time rates for all hours they worked. Because these workers were employees, they should have been paid time-and-a-half wages after they surpassed 40 hours in a workweek. Both contractors were also required to keep complete and accurate records of all hours their employees worked. This case reveals the importance of correctly classifying workers at the outset of the relationship and ensuring accurate and complete records are kept.


Sometimes it can be difficult to determine whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. However, seeking legal advice in these situations can help curtail potential violations and costly mistakes.


FMLA Violations

The FMLA protects workers who need to take a prolonged absence due to a qualified family or medical reason. This law was enacted so employees could deal with serious and potentially unexpected life circumstances without losing their jobs. Yet, an employee can follow all proper procedures, and an untrained or uninformed manager may still violate the law, resulting in costly consequences.


In this article’s Atlanta, Georgia, case study, the Georgia Department of Public Health wrongly denied the employee’s request for FMLA leave, believing the employee’s condition did not qualify for leave. As a result of the denied leave request, the employee was disciplined and subsequently terminated due to absences related to their FMLA-qualified condition. Employers must be aware of conditions that qualify for FMLA leave to avoid wrongfully disciplining or terminating otherwise protected employees.


FMLA violations can be particularly costly, as they may involve paying back employees’ lost wages and reinstating lost benefits. Employers need to ensure managers, employees and other stakeholders understand their FMLA rights. This includes knowing how to submit FMLA requests, understanding situations that might qualify for FMLA leave and comprehending workplace guarantees that come with this leave (e.g., job protection). Understanding these details can help prevent wrongful termination and significant monetary penalties.

 

Conclusion

These wage and hour violation case studies demonstrate how easy it can be for an employer to face challenges related to wage and hour regulations. That’s why it’s so important for employers to seek professional guidance before making potentially costly decisions. By learning from these employers’ mistakes, others in similar industries can avoid major violations and prevent DOL audits.

Sign up for our newsletter.

5 Auto Insurance Mistakes Drivers Don’t Realize They’re Making

March 5, 2026
Auto insurance is something most people set up once and rarely revisit. As long as the policy is active and premiums are paid, it’s easy to assume everything is working as it should. But over time, vehicles change, driving habits evolve, and insurance needs shift. Many drivers unknowingly make small decisions that can leave them underprotected, overpaying, or surprised when a claim occurs. Here are five common auto insurance mistakes drivers make without realizing it, and how a quick review of your coverage can help prevent them. 1. Carrying Only the State Minimum Coverage Many drivers assume that if they meet their state’s minimum insurance requirements, they’re fully protected. In reality, minimum coverage is typically designed to satisfy legal requirements, not necessarily to protect you financially in a serious accident. For example, New York requires drivers to carry at least: $10,000 for property damage for a single crash $25,000 for bodily injury (and $50,000 for death) for one person in a crash $50,000 for bodily injury (and $100,000 for death) for two or more people in a crash These limits allow a vehicle to be legally registered and operated in New York State, but they may not fully cover the costs associated with a major accident, particularly as medical expenses and vehicle repair costs continue to rise. Because of this, many drivers choose higher liability limits to better protect their assets in the event of a serious claim. 2. Assuming Your Policy Automatically Keeps Up With Life Changes Insurance policies don’t automatically adjust when life changes. Yet many drivers forget to update their coverage when their circumstances shift. For example, adding a teenage driver to the household, purchasing a newer or more expensive vehicle, or even relocating to a different area can all affect the type and amount of coverage you may need. Common life events that should trigger a policy review include: Moving to a new home or state Adding a new driver to the household Buying or leasing a new vehicle Changing how often or how far you drive Using your vehicle for business or gig work If your insurer isn’t aware of these changes, your coverage may not accurately reflect your current situation, which could create complications or delays if a claim ever occurs. 3. Overlooking the Risk of Being Underinsured A surprising number of drivers carry coverage that is technically valid but insufficient for real-world risks. While the policy may meet legal requirements, it may not fully protect against the financial impact of a serious accident. This is especially important when considering uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage . If another driver causes an accident but does not have insurance, or carries only minimal coverage, these protections may help cover injuries or losses that the at-fault driver’s policy cannot. In situations involving medical bills, lost wages, or long-term injury, the costs can quickly exceed basic policy limits. Without adequate protection in place, drivers may find themselves responsible for expenses they assumed would be covered. 4. Choosing Deductibles Without Reassessing Them Deductibles often get set once and then forgotten. Over time, however, a deductible that once made sense might no longer align with your financial situation or your comfort level with risk. For example: A higher deductible may lower your premium but increase out-of-pocket costs after a claim. A lower deductible may offer more predictable costs during a claim but can result in higher monthly premiums. As vehicles age or financial circumstances change, it may make sense to revisit this balance. Some drivers choose to increase deductibles once they have built savings for emergencies, while others prefer lower deductibles to reduce uncertainty in the event of an accident. Periodically reviewing this choice ensures your policy reflects both your budget and your risk tolerance. 5. Not Reviewing Your Policy Regularly Auto insurance is not meant to be a “set it and forget it” decision. Coverage that made sense a few years ago may no longer reflect your vehicle’s value, your driving habits, or today’s repair and liability costs. Vehicle repair costs, parts availability, and accident-related expenses have all changed significantly in recent years. New vehicle technology, advanced safety systems, and rising labor costs have made repairs more expensive than many drivers realize. Taking a few minutes once a year to review your policy can help ensure your coverage keeps pace with these changes and continues to provide the protection you expect. A Quick Coverage Review Can Make a Big Difference Many auto insurance mistakes aren’t about reckless driving or major oversights. More often, they happen simply because policies are rarely revisited. A quick review can help you: confirm liability limits still make sense evaluate deductibles and coverage options account for life or vehicle changes identify potential gaps before a claim occurs Making Sure Your Coverage Still Fits At Simco Insurance & Wealth Management, our licensed agents review coverage across multiple carriers to help individuals and families find solutions that fit their needs and budget. If it has been a while since you reviewed your auto insurance, taking a fresh look may help ensure your policy still provides the protection you expect. Because when it comes to insurance, the most expensive mistakes are often the ones people never realize they’re making.

The Hidden Costs of Disconnected HR, Payroll, and Benefits Systems

February 25, 2026
Over the past few years, employers have adopted more technology, more vendors, and more specialized partners than ever before. On paper, it makes sense. One provider handles payroll. Another manages benefits. A broker oversees commercial insurance. A third-party administrator handles retirement plans. Individually, each relationship may work well. Collectively, however, fragmentation can quietly create inefficiencies, risk, and missed opportunities that compound over time. As organizations grow and workforce expectations evolve, more employers are stepping back and asking a bigger question: Is our current structure helping us move faster, or slowing us down? As an isolved Network Partner, we closely follow industry research and employer sentiment. In isolved’s Second-Annual Business Owner Report, 76% of business owners say owning a business has become more complicated in the past year, with increased costs cited as the leading driver of that complexity. That complexity often does not stem from one single issue. It builds gradually, especially when systems, vendors, and processes are not aligned. Here’s where the hidden costs of disconnected workforce management tend to show up. Administrative Work That Multiplies Instead of Scales When HR, payroll, benefits, insurance, and retirement services live in separate systems, the workload rarely stays separate. Teams often find themselves entering the same employee data into multiple platforms, reconciling discrepancies between systems, coordinating updates across vendors, and serving as the “go-between” when issues arise. What starts as manageable complexity can become operational drag as your organization grows. Instead of scaling efficiently, internal teams spend valuable time maintaining systems that do not talk to one another. In 2026, when speed and agility matter more than ever, duplicated effort is a cost many employers can no longer afford. Errors That Ripple Across Departments Disconnected systems increase the risk of misalignment. A simple change, such as a salary update or benefits adjustment, can require coordination across multiple vendors. When systems are not integrated, even small inconsistencies can lead to: Incorrect payroll deductions Delayed or inaccurate retirement contributions Benefits enrollment discrepancies Insurance classification or coverage gaps These issues are rarely intentional. They are structural. And when they occur, they impact compliance, employee trust, and leadership confidence. The more vendors involved, the more potential points of failure. Limited Visibility into Workforce Data Today’s employers are expected to make data-driven decisions. But when workforce data is scattered across multiple platforms, clarity becomes harder to achieve. Leaders may struggle to accurately analyze total labor costs, forecast benefits spending trends, identify compliance vulnerabilities, or understand retention or engagement patterns. Without a unified view, decision-making becomes reactive instead of strategic. Employers often know they need better insight, but the systems in place make it difficult to access a full picture. The Real Cost Isn’t Just Vendor Fees Fragmentation does not just increase subscription costs. It creates hidden internal expenses that are harder to measure. Consider the cumulative impact of: Hours spent managing vendor relationships Time dedicated to troubleshooting integration gaps Implementation and training for multiple platforms Costs associated with compliance corrections Technology upgrades required to “bridge” disconnected systems Over time, these operational inefficiencies compound. Resources that could support growth initiatives, employee development, or strategic planning are redirected toward maintaining infrastructure. The financial impact is rarely immediate. It builds gradually. Employee Experience Suffers Quietly Employees feel the effects of fragmentation, even if they cannot articulate the cause. They may encounter multiple logins for payroll and benefits information, confusion about whom to contact for support, delays when issues require coordination between vendors, and inconsistent messaging across systems. In today’s environment, where employee experience influences retention and recruitment, friction matters. A disconnected backend often creates a disconnected front-end experience. Why More Employers Are Reconsidering Their Structure In 2026, employers are thinking beyond cost comparisons. They are asking how their workforce infrastructure supports scalability, compliance confidence, data clarity, leadership decision-making, and a seamless employee experience. Integration does not mean sacrificing expertise. It means aligning systems and services so they function together rather than independently. When HR, payroll/HCM, benefits, commercial insurance, and retirement services are coordinated through a unified structure, organizations gain: Reduced duplication of effort Stronger compliance alignment Clearer reporting and analytics More responsive support Greater operational efficiency Most importantly, leaders gain time and visibility to focus on strategy instead of system maintenance. A Strategic Moment to Evaluate Your Model March is often a natural checkpoint. The year is underway. Hiring plans are in motion. Benefits utilization data is emerging. Payroll trends are clearer. This is an ideal time to step back and assess whether your vendor structure is supporting your long-term goals or creating unnecessary friction. If your organization is juggling multiple providers for HR, payroll, benefits, commercial insurance, and retirement services, it may be worth exploring whether a more integrated approach could simplify operations and strengthen outcomes. At Simco , we work with employers who are ready to reduce complexity, improve alignment, and build infrastructure that supports growth rather than slows it down. The hidden costs of fragmentation rarely show up all at once, but addressing them intentionally can create measurable impact across your organization.

Safer Internet Day 2026: What Smart, Safe AI Use Means for Employers

February 10, 2026
Today, February 10, 2026, marks Safer Internet Day, a global initiative focused on creating a safer, more responsible digital world. The event is coordinated in the United States by ConnectSafely and is recognized in more than 100 countries worldwide. This year’s theme, “Smart tech, safe choices: Exploring the safe and responsible use of AI,” could not be more timely. While much of the conversation centers on children and young people, employers have an equally important role to play. Artificial intelligence is already embedded in the workplace, whether through productivity tools, hiring platforms, data analysis, customer interactions, or everyday decision-making. The question for employers is no longer whether AI is being used, but how responsibly and thoughtfully it is being integrated into work environments. Why Safer Internet Day Matters in the Workplace AI and smart technology do not just affect personal browsing habits. They influence how employees communicate, create content, analyze information, and make decisions. Without clear guidance, organizations can face real risks, including data privacy concerns, compliance issues, reputational damage, and erosion of trust. Safer Internet Day serves as a reminder that responsible technology use is not just an IT issue. It is a people, policy, and culture issue, and employers play a critical role in setting expectations. Smart Tech Requires Clear Choices at Work The theme “smart tech, safe choices” translates directly to the workplace. Employees are navigating tools that can generate content, summarize data, automate tasks, and make recommendations, sometimes without fully understanding limitations, bias, or data exposure risks. For employers, this raises important questions: Are employees clear on when and how AI tools can be used at work? Do existing policies address data security, confidentiality, and accuracy when using AI? Are managers equipped to guide teams responsibly, not just efficiently? Responsible AI use starts with clarity. When expectations are clear, employees are better positioned to make good choices without fear or confusion. Key Areas Employers Should Be Thinking About Safer Internet Day 2026 highlights several focus areas that directly apply to business environments. Generative AI AI tools can boost productivity, but they can also introduce risk if employees unknowingly share sensitive data or rely on outputs without validation. Employers should provide guidance on acceptable use, data boundaries, and accountability. Media Literacy and Critical Thinking AI-generated content can blur the line between fact and fiction. Encouraging critical thinking helps employees evaluate information, verify sources, and avoid spreading misinformation internally or externally. Civility and Workplace Culture Digital tools shape how people communicate. Employers set the tone for respectful, professional online interactions, whether through email, chat platforms, or AI-assisted communication. Wellness, Identity, and Self-Respect Always-on technology and AI-driven performance pressure can contribute to burnout or insecurity. Employers who acknowledge these realities and promote healthy boundaries help support long-term employee well-being. Scams, Fraud, and Social Engineering AI has made scams more sophisticated. Training employees to recognize phishing, deepfakes, and impersonation attempts is now a critical part of risk management. What Employers Can Do, Starting Now You do not need a perfect AI strategy to make progress. Even small, intentional steps can help create a safer, smarter digital workplace. Review existing policies to see where AI and smart technology use should be addressed or clarified. Communicate clear expectations around data protection, confidentiality, and responsible use. Equip managers to have informed conversations with their teams about AI tools. Encourage questions and transparency rather than silent experimentation. Treat responsible technology use as an ongoing conversation, not a one-time rollout. These actions signal to employees that technology is meant to support their work, not create risk or uncertainty. A Shared Responsibility for a Better Internet and a Better Workplace Safer Internet Day’s broader message, “Together for a Better Internet,” applies just as much inside organizations as it does online. Employers, leaders, and employees all share responsibility for how technology is used and how its impact is managed. When organizations approach AI with intention, clarity, and care, they create workplaces that are not only more productive, but also more secure, ethical, and human. At Simco, we work with employers to navigate the evolving intersection of technology, people, policy, and risk. If you are thinking about how AI and smart technology fit into your workplace and how to guide employees responsibly, we are here to help .

Have a question? Get in touch.