NY State is one of the toughest states to comply with business laws and regulations. Not only are the tax laws and statutory requirements some of the most stringent in the country, but we also have some of the strictest laws when it comes to worker’s rights and employer’s responsibilities. Often business owners believe that because they do not have employees that they do not have liability from the same types of claims that an employer might face in the case of an injured worker. In NY state you couldn’t be farther from the truth. The sole remedy of an employer is a worker’s compensation employer’s liability policy which statutorily protects the employer from being sued under any other liability. That’s where the property owner, project owner or the GC come in, after the injured worker calls Dewey Cheatum and How, they are advised that there are other “responsible parties” to access and may be seen as deep pockets. There is typically no such coverage afforded to those who do not have employees under a general liability policy unless that policy is endorsed to include these types of claims.
When it comes to people working on projects in which you have control you have a web of litigation land mines that are hard to navigate and hard to purchase risk transfer products without breaking the bank. The origination of these laws that affect owners without direct employees were enacted over 100 years ago and still persist today creating a legal environment heavily in favor of workers and their rights to be compensated adequately for injuries sustained while working for others.
Three Laws Employers Should Know About
The statutes in question are actually three different laws but are commonly referred to by several monikers such as “third party action-over”, the “scaffold law”, “fall from height”, or just plain “labor law.” The law refers to sections 200, 240 and 241 of the NY State labor law.
- Labor Law § 200 (the Safe Work Environment Statute) requires a reasonably safe work environment for all employees and others legally at the worksite. Employers must properly maintain, guard, and light the worksite, safely operate machinery, equipment, and other devices.
- Labor Law § 240(1) (the Scaffold, Ladder and Working at a Height Statute) has been interpreted by New York courts to impose a nondelegable duty to provide safety devices to protect against elevation-related hazards on construction sites. Project owners and general contractors are absolutely liable for any violation that results in an injury, regardless of whether the project owner or general contractor (GC) supervised or controlled the work.5 Further, the worker’s own negligence will not bar or reduce the worker’s recovery.
- Labor Law § 241(6) (the Construction, Excavation and Demolition Work Statute) imposes a nondelegable duty on project owners and GCs to keep workplaces safe from trip and slip hazards and other related hazards. A plaintiff seeking damages pursuant to this statute is not required to show that the project owner or GC exercised supervision or control over his worksite to establish a right of recovery. However, a violation under this statute, unlike a violation of Labor Law § 240(1), is only evidence of negligence on the part of project owner or GC. Absolute liability is not imposed by proof of a violation; therefore, the injured worker’s contributory and comparative negligence are considered viable defenses to a claim under this section
Responsible Parties
These laws allow an injured worker to collect workers compensation benefits from their employer as well as litigate against other “responsible parties.” These other “responsible parties” are subject to absolute liability, meaning common law negligence standards don’t apply. This is known as a third-party-over action, a type of action in which an injured employee, after collecting workers compensation benefits from the employer, sues a third party for contributing to the employee’s injury. Typically, the target of such suits are project owners or general contractors for damages such as:
- Lost Wages;
- Medical Expenses;
- Pain and suffering; and
- Any other damage, as the court may see fit.
These laws apply to employers, general contractors, property owners and their agents. A property owner includes any person with an interest in the property and any person who fulfills the role of owner by contracting to have work performed on the property for his or her benefit. This definition includes anyone who may have leased the property but retains the right to control how the work is to be performed on the property.
New York courts have consistently held that an entity is subject to Section 200’s duty of care if it exercises supervisory control over the work performed on the property. The courts have also clarified that merely monitoring the timing and quality of the work is not sufficient to establish control.
Good Defense needs Offense
The underlying purpose of these laws which were enacted over 100 years ago, is to ensure that construction workers injured on job sites receive fair compensation for the losses they suffer. Over the years, New York courts have broadened the scope of these statutes and adapted them to modern worksite dangers. At the same time, juries in the five boroughs have consistently awarded large verdicts to injured workers who allege violations of these laws. This confluence of factors has created unique challenges for risk transfer: insurance premiums are higher and beneficial coverage terms are harder to obtain. Even when you’re not doing work downstate you still can be subject to litigation; we have the same laws, just not the same judicial environment, YET.
Recommendations
- Use vetted contracts
- Seek the advice of council for contract agreements
- Know what is in the contract and what each requirement means
- If you choose to seek liability insurance covering this type of action speak with your trusted insurance advisor early on and allow adequate time for marketing
Sign up for our newsletter.
