COBRA Subsidy Provisions of the American Rescue Plan Act
March 24, 2021

Highlights

Eligible Individuals

The subsidy is generally available to people who elected COBRA, become eligible for COBRA, or declined or discontinued COBRA and are still within their original COBRA coverage period.

Funding

The subsidy is funded by a refundable, advanceable credit against payroll taxes taken by employers or carriers.

Option to Switch Coverage

The ARPA allows covered individuals to switch to similarly priced health coverage, if the employer allows it.


Important Dates

April 1, 2021

ARPA 100% subsidy begins to cover COBRA premiums.

Sept. 30, 2021

ARPA subsidy provision for COBRA premiums expires.


The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), signed into law March 11, 2021, provides a 100% subsidy of premiums for employer-sponsored group health insurance continued under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986 (COBRA) and similar state continuation of coverage (mini-COBRA) programs.


ARPA subsidies cover the full cost of COBRA or mini-COBRA premiums from April 1, 2021, through Sept. 30, 2021, for employees (and their qualifying family members), if the employee lost or loses group health insurance due to an involuntary job loss or reduction in work hours. The subsidy applies to people who are still within their original COBRA or mini-COBRA coverage period, for the length of that coverage period, even if they declined or dropped COBRA or mini-COBRA coverage earlier.

The subsidy does not apply to:


  • Individuals whose job loss was voluntary or the result of gross misconduct; or
  • Individuals who are eligible for another group health plan or Medicare.


The subsidies are funded through a payroll tax credit. Employers are required to provide new notices about the subsidy to employees. The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) will issue model notices for this purpose.


Action Steps

Employers should familiarize themselves with the provisions of the ARPA and watch for agency guidance on its implementation.


Overview

COBRA requires group health plans to allow covered employees and their dependents to continue their group health plan coverage when it would be lost due to specific events, such as a termination of employment or reduction in working hours. Individuals are usually allowed to continue their COBRA coverage for 18 months, although some similar state mini-COBRA laws mandate a longer coverage period.


Under COBRA, group health plans may require those covered to pay 102% of the premium for their continuing health insurance, leading many eligible individuals to decline coverage. The ARPA subsidy covers the full cost of COBRA or mini-COBRA premiums from April 1 - Sept. 30, 2021, for “assistance-eligible individuals.”


Covered Plans

The COBRA subsidy in the ARPA applies to group health plans subject to federal COBRA or to a state mini-COBRA program. Plans subject to federal COBRA are plans maintained by employers with 20 or more employees on more than 50% of the business days in the previous calendar year. Small-employer plans, small governmental plans and church plans are not subject to federal COBRA, but may be subject to a state mini-COBRA law and therefore be covered by the ARPA’s COBRA subsidy provisions. 


Health flexible spending arrangements under Section 125 cafeteria plans are not covered by the ARPA COBRA subsidy.


Eligible Individuals

Individuals are eligible for the COBRA subsidy if they:


  • Are a qualified beneficiary of the group health plan; and
  • Are eligible for COBRA or mini-COBRA continuation coverage because of the covered employee’s involuntary termination (unrelated to gross misconduct) or reduction in hours of employment.


The subsidy is not available for people who voluntarily left their job. It is also unavailable for people who are eligible for Medicare or another group health plan, not including:


  • A plan covering only excepted benefits;
  • A qualified small employer health reimbursement arrangement; or
  • A flexible spending arrangement.


Furthermore, individuals receiving a COBRA subsidy who become eligible for a group health plan or Medicare must inform the health plan for which they are receiving the subsidy of that fact, or face a penalty. The premium subsidy is not counted as gross income.


Extended Election Period

The ARPA allows individuals to elect subsidized COBRA if they:


  • Become eligible for COBRA or mini-COBRA due to involuntary job termination (not caused by gross misconduct) or reduction in hours between April 1 and Sept. 30, 2021;
  • Previously declined COBRA or mini-COBRA after becoming eligible due to involuntary job termination (not caused by gross misconduct) or reduction in hours, but would still be within their COBRA or mini-COBRA coverage period had they elected the coverage at that point; or
  • Previously elected COBRA or mini-COBRA but discontinued the coverage before April 1, 2021.


The election period for subsidized COBRA under ARPA begins on April 1, 2021, and runs until 60 days after the date individuals receive notice from the health plan of the availability of the COBRA subsidy.


Duration of Coverage

COBRA and mini-COBRA coverage under the ARPA election extension starts with the first period of coverage beginning on or after April 1, 2021, and continues through the end of the individual’s COBRA or mini-COBRA coverage period. The individual’s COBRA or mini-COBRA coverage period is the period that would have applied had the individual elected the continuation coverage when first eligible following the initial qualifying event. For individuals who previously elected COBRA or mini-COBRA, discontinued it, and are now using the ARPA extended election period to obtain COBRA, the COBRA coverage period is calculated as if they had not dropped the coverage.


Switching Coverage

The ARPA contains a provision that—at the employer’s option—allows individuals eligible for the COBRA subsidy and enrolled in the employer’s group health plan to change to different health coverage also offered by the employer. The new coverage cannot have a higher premium than the individual’s previous coverage, and it must be offered to similarly situated active employees. The option does not apply to plans that provide only excepted benefits, to qualified small employer health reimbursement arrangements or to health flexible spending arrangements.

The change must be elected within 90 days of the employee receiving notice of the option.


Notice Requirements

The ARPA imposes new COBRA notice requirements on health plans.


General Notice

Plan administrators must provide notification of COBRA benefits under ARPA. The notice must be written in clear and understandable language, and it must inform recipients of the availability of ARPA premium assistance and the option under the ARPA to enroll in different coverage (if the employer permits the option).


The notice must be provided to individuals who become eligible for COBRA or mini-COBRA during the period of April 1 - Sept. 30, 2021. In addition, it must be provided by May 31, 2021, to people who have already elected COBRA coverage, and to people subject to the ARPA election extension—that is, people eligible for the subsidy who declined or discontinued COBRA or mini-COBRA before April 1, 2021.


The notification may be included in an amendment to a plan’s existing notices or be given in a separate notice, but it must contain the following information:


  1. The forms necessary for establishing eligibility for premium assistance
  2. The name, address and telephone number necessary to contact the plan administrator and any other person maintaining relevant information in connection with premium assistance
  3. A description of the extended election period under the ARPA
  4. A description of the obligation of qualified beneficiaries to notify the plan if they become eligible for another group health plan or Medicare, and the penalty for failure to do so
  5. A prominently displayed description of the right to a subsidized premium and any conditions on entitlement to the subsidized premium
  6. A description of the option of the right to enroll in different coverage (if the employer permits this option)


The DOL is charged with issuing a model general notice by April 10, 2021, for plans to use to meet the general notice requirement.


Notice of Expiration of Subsidy

Plans must also provide individuals eligible for the ARPA subsidy with notice of its expiration. The notice must be written in clear and understandable language, and inform recipients that:


  • The premium assistance will expire soon, prominently identifying the expiration date; and
  • The individual may be eligible for coverage without premium assistance through COBRA continuation or a group health plan.


Plans are not required to issue an expiration notice to individuals whose subsidy is expiring because they became eligible for other group health plan coverage or Medicare.


The notice must be provided during the 45 - 15-day period before the individual’s subsidy expires. The DOL must issue model expiration notices by April 25, 2021.


Tax Credit

The ARPA COBRA subsidy is funded through a tax credit to employers whose plans are subject to COBRA or are self-insured, to the plan for multiemployer plans, and to the insurer for other plans. The credit is taken against payroll taxes. It can be advanced (according to forms and instructions to be provided by federal agencies) and is fully refundable. The credits will be provided each quarter in an amount equal to the premiums not paid by assistance-eligible individuals.

Sign up for our newsletter.

March 10, 2026
By early spring, most organizations have settled into the rhythm of the new year. Payroll cycles are running, benefits elections have taken effect, and hiring plans are starting to move forward. It is also around this time that small administrative issues tend to surface. A deduction that was entered incorrectly. A PTO balance that does not quite look right. A job description that no longer reflects what someone actually does day to day. None of these problems usually start out as major concerns. But when they go unnoticed for months, they can create compliance risks, payroll corrections, or frustrating employee experiences later in the year. Taking a little time now to review a few core HR and payroll areas can help catch issues early and keep your systems running the way they should. 1. Payroll Deductions and Employee Pay Accuracy Payroll errors rarely happen because someone intentionally entered the wrong information. More often they occur because small changes throughout the year were not reflected consistently across systems. Spring is a good time to review payroll deductions line by line and make sure everything matches current elections and agreements. Start by checking: Health, dental, and vision deductions against current benefit elections Retirement contributions and employer match calculations Garnishments or wage attachments that may have started or ended Bonus or commission structures tied to payroll calculations It is also worth confirming that salary adjustments made at the start of the year were properly applied across payroll and HR records. A mismatch between HR systems and payroll can create issues that compound over time. Run a payroll audit report if your system allows it. Compare gross wages, deductions, and net pay for a sampling of employees across departments. Look for unusual fluctuations or rounding inconsistencies. Even one small discrepancy can create confusion for employees and require retroactive corrections later. 2. PTO Balances and Accrual Policies Paid time off policies can quietly become inconsistent if they are not reviewed periodically. Accrual rules may have changed, new hires may have different policies than long-tenured employees, and carryover limits can easily be overlooked. Take time this spring to verify that PTO balances reflect the rules outlined in your employee handbook. Focus on questions such as: Are accrual rates being applied correctly based on tenure? Are carryover limits being enforced as expected? Have any manual adjustments been made that need documentation? Do employees clearly understand how their PTO accumulates and resets? This review also helps identify employees who may have unusually high PTO balances. Addressing those early can help avoid operational challenges later in the year when many employees begin using vacation time. 3. Employee Classification and Job Roles Misclassification remains one of the most common compliance risks employers face. Over time, job responsibilities evolve, and a position that once qualified for a particular classification may no longer meet the criteria. Use this time to review whether employees are properly classified as exempt or non-exempt under wage and hour laws. Look closely at: Employees who received promotions or expanded responsibilities Positions that involve supervisory duties Roles that combine administrative and operational tasks Job descriptions should accurately reflect what employees actually do day to day. If responsibilities have shifted significantly, the classification may need to be reevaluated. Clear documentation is important here. Updated job descriptions help support classification decisions and provide clarity for both employees and managers. 4. Employee Handbook and Workplace Policies Policies that felt current a year ago may now need adjustments. Workplace expectations evolve quickly, and spring is a practical time to review whether your handbook reflects the way your organization actually operates. Pay particular attention to policies related to: Remote or hybrid work expectations Use of artificial intelligence tools in the workplace Timekeeping and attendance procedures Workplace conduct and communication standards It is also wise to confirm that any state-specific policies remain compliant with current regulations. If your workforce spans multiple states, small policy differences may need to be addressed. Updating a handbook does not necessarily mean rewriting the entire document. Sometimes a few targeted revisions can ensure employees have clear guidance and leadership has consistent standards to follow. 5. Benefits Eligibility and Employee Status Changes Benefits eligibility errors can happen when employee status changes are not updated in a timely manner. Review employees who experienced changes during the past several months. This includes individuals who moved from part-time to full-time status, those who returned from leave, and employees who changed departments or compensation structures. Make sure eligibility for benefits matches the organization’s plan requirements. Check that: Newly eligible employees were offered enrollment opportunities Terminated employees were removed from benefit plans promptly COBRA notifications were issued when required Dependent eligibility rules are being followed consistently Even minor oversights in this area can create complications with carriers or leave employees temporarily without the coverage they expect. 6. Workers’ Compensation Classifications Workers’ compensation classifications often remain unchanged year after year, even when job duties evolve. If employees begin performing different tasks than originally described, their classification may no longer match the level of risk associated with the role. Incorrect classifications can lead to inaccurate premium calculations and potential audit findings later. Take time to review job roles that involve: Operational or physical work environments Field service or travel responsibilities Equipment use or safety considerations Confirm that the workers’ compensation codes associated with these positions still reflect the work being performed. Employers who review this annually are often better prepared when insurance audits occur. 7. HR and Payroll System Alignment Finally, look at how your HR and payroll systems interact with each other . Many organizations rely on multiple platforms for HR, payroll, benefits administration, and reporting. When systems do not communicate effectively, teams often compensate by manually transferring data between them. That can create hidden inefficiencies and increase the chance of errors. Ask yourself: Are employee records consistent across all systems? Are onboarding updates automatically reflected in payroll and benefits platforms? Are reporting tools pulling accurate workforce data? For some employers, this review reveals that processes have become more manual than intended. Working with a partner that integrates HR, payroll, benefits, and insurance services can make much of this coordination significantly easier. At Simco , we help employers align these systems so information flows more smoothly and administrative teams spend less time reconciling data. A Small Review Now Prevents Bigger Issues Later Spring reviews do not have to be complicated or time-consuming. Even a few focused hours reviewing payroll accuracy, employee classifications, and benefits records can uncover issues that are much easier to fix now than later in the year. Employers who take time to review these areas early often avoid the mid-year scramble that happens when small inconsistencies finally surface. A short operational check-in today can help ensure the rest of the year runs more smoothly for both your leadership team and your employees.
March 5, 2026
Auto insurance is something most people set up once and rarely revisit. As long as the policy is active and premiums are paid, it’s easy to assume everything is working as it should. But over time, vehicles change, driving habits evolve, and insurance needs shift. Many drivers unknowingly make small decisions that can leave them underprotected, overpaying, or surprised when a claim occurs. Here are five common auto insurance mistakes drivers make without realizing it, and how a quick review of your coverage can help prevent them. 1. Carrying Only the State Minimum Coverage Many drivers assume that if they meet their state’s minimum insurance requirements, they’re fully protected. In reality, minimum coverage is typically designed to satisfy legal requirements, not necessarily to protect you financially in a serious accident. For example, New York requires drivers to carry at least: $10,000 for property damage for a single crash $25,000 for bodily injury (and $50,000 for death) for one person in a crash $50,000 for bodily injury (and $100,000 for death) for two or more people in a crash These limits allow a vehicle to be legally registered and operated in New York State, but they may not fully cover the costs associated with a major accident, particularly as medical expenses and vehicle repair costs continue to rise. Because of this, many drivers choose higher liability limits to better protect their assets in the event of a serious claim. 2. Assuming Your Policy Automatically Keeps Up With Life Changes Insurance policies don’t automatically adjust when life changes. Yet many drivers forget to update their coverage when their circumstances shift. For example, adding a teenage driver to the household, purchasing a newer or more expensive vehicle, or even relocating to a different area can all affect the type and amount of coverage you may need. Common life events that should trigger a policy review include: Moving to a new home or state Adding a new driver to the household Buying or leasing a new vehicle Changing how often or how far you drive Using your vehicle for business or gig work If your insurer isn’t aware of these changes, your coverage may not accurately reflect your current situation, which could create complications or delays if a claim ever occurs. 3. Overlooking the Risk of Being Underinsured A surprising number of drivers carry coverage that is technically valid but insufficient for real-world risks. While the policy may meet legal requirements, it may not fully protect against the financial impact of a serious accident. This is especially important when considering uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage . If another driver causes an accident but does not have insurance, or carries only minimal coverage, these protections may help cover injuries or losses that the at-fault driver’s policy cannot. In situations involving medical bills, lost wages, or long-term injury, the costs can quickly exceed basic policy limits. Without adequate protection in place, drivers may find themselves responsible for expenses they assumed would be covered. 4. Choosing Deductibles Without Reassessing Them Deductibles often get set once and then forgotten. Over time, however, a deductible that once made sense might no longer align with your financial situation or your comfort level with risk. For example: A higher deductible may lower your premium but increase out-of-pocket costs after a claim. A lower deductible may offer more predictable costs during a claim but can result in higher monthly premiums. As vehicles age or financial circumstances change, it may make sense to revisit this balance. Some drivers choose to increase deductibles once they have built savings for emergencies, while others prefer lower deductibles to reduce uncertainty in the event of an accident. Periodically reviewing this choice ensures your policy reflects both your budget and your risk tolerance. 5. Not Reviewing Your Policy Regularly Auto insurance is not meant to be a “set it and forget it” decision. Coverage that made sense a few years ago may no longer reflect your vehicle’s value, your driving habits, or today’s repair and liability costs. Vehicle repair costs, parts availability, and accident-related expenses have all changed significantly in recent years. New vehicle technology, advanced safety systems, and rising labor costs have made repairs more expensive than many drivers realize. Taking a few minutes once a year to review your policy can help ensure your coverage keeps pace with these changes and continues to provide the protection you expect. A Quick Coverage Review Can Make a Big Difference Many auto insurance mistakes aren’t about reckless driving or major oversights. More often, they happen simply because policies are rarely revisited. A quick review can help you: confirm liability limits still make sense evaluate deductibles and coverage options account for life or vehicle changes identify potential gaps before a claim occurs Making Sure Your Coverage Still Fits At Simco Insurance & Wealth Management, our licensed agents review coverage across multiple carriers to help individuals and families find solutions that fit their needs and budget. If it has been a while since you reviewed your auto insurance, taking a fresh look may help ensure your policy still provides the protection you expect. Because when it comes to insurance, the most expensive mistakes are often the ones people never realize they’re making.
February 25, 2026
Over the past few years, employers have adopted more technology, more vendors, and more specialized partners than ever before. On paper, it makes sense. One provider handles payroll. Another manages benefits. A broker oversees commercial insurance. A third-party administrator handles retirement plans. Individually, each relationship may work well. Collectively, however, fragmentation can quietly create inefficiencies, risk, and missed opportunities that compound over time. As organizations grow and workforce expectations evolve, more employers are stepping back and asking a bigger question: Is our current structure helping us move faster, or slowing us down? As an isolved Network Partner, we closely follow industry research and employer sentiment. In isolved’s Second-Annual Business Owner Report, 76% of business owners say owning a business has become more complicated in the past year, with increased costs cited as the leading driver of that complexity. That complexity often does not stem from one single issue. It builds gradually, especially when systems, vendors, and processes are not aligned. Here’s where the hidden costs of disconnected workforce management tend to show up. Administrative Work That Multiplies Instead of Scales When HR, payroll, benefits, insurance, and retirement services live in separate systems, the workload rarely stays separate. Teams often find themselves entering the same employee data into multiple platforms, reconciling discrepancies between systems, coordinating updates across vendors, and serving as the “go-between” when issues arise. What starts as manageable complexity can become operational drag as your organization grows. Instead of scaling efficiently, internal teams spend valuable time maintaining systems that do not talk to one another. In 2026, when speed and agility matter more than ever, duplicated effort is a cost many employers can no longer afford. Errors That Ripple Across Departments Disconnected systems increase the risk of misalignment. A simple change, such as a salary update or benefits adjustment, can require coordination across multiple vendors. When systems are not integrated, even small inconsistencies can lead to: Incorrect payroll deductions Delayed or inaccurate retirement contributions Benefits enrollment discrepancies Insurance classification or coverage gaps These issues are rarely intentional. They are structural. And when they occur, they impact compliance, employee trust, and leadership confidence. The more vendors involved, the more potential points of failure. Limited Visibility into Workforce Data Today’s employers are expected to make data-driven decisions. But when workforce data is scattered across multiple platforms, clarity becomes harder to achieve. Leaders may struggle to accurately analyze total labor costs, forecast benefits spending trends, identify compliance vulnerabilities, or understand retention or engagement patterns. Without a unified view, decision-making becomes reactive instead of strategic. Employers often know they need better insight, but the systems in place make it difficult to access a full picture. The Real Cost Isn’t Just Vendor Fees Fragmentation does not just increase subscription costs. It creates hidden internal expenses that are harder to measure. Consider the cumulative impact of: Hours spent managing vendor relationships Time dedicated to troubleshooting integration gaps Implementation and training for multiple platforms Costs associated with compliance corrections Technology upgrades required to “bridge” disconnected systems Over time, these operational inefficiencies compound. Resources that could support growth initiatives, employee development, or strategic planning are redirected toward maintaining infrastructure. The financial impact is rarely immediate. It builds gradually. Employee Experience Suffers Quietly Employees feel the effects of fragmentation, even if they cannot articulate the cause. They may encounter multiple logins for payroll and benefits information, confusion about whom to contact for support, delays when issues require coordination between vendors, and inconsistent messaging across systems. In today’s environment, where employee experience influences retention and recruitment, friction matters. A disconnected backend often creates a disconnected front-end experience. Why More Employers Are Reconsidering Their Structure In 2026, employers are thinking beyond cost comparisons. They are asking how their workforce infrastructure supports scalability, compliance confidence, data clarity, leadership decision-making, and a seamless employee experience. Integration does not mean sacrificing expertise. It means aligning systems and services so they function together rather than independently. When HR, payroll/HCM, benefits, commercial insurance, and retirement services are coordinated through a unified structure, organizations gain: Reduced duplication of effort Stronger compliance alignment Clearer reporting and analytics More responsive support Greater operational efficiency Most importantly, leaders gain time and visibility to focus on strategy instead of system maintenance. A Strategic Moment to Evaluate Your Model March is often a natural checkpoint. The year is underway. Hiring plans are in motion. Benefits utilization data is emerging. Payroll trends are clearer. This is an ideal time to step back and assess whether your vendor structure is supporting your long-term goals or creating unnecessary friction. If your organization is juggling multiple providers for HR, payroll, benefits, commercial insurance, and retirement services, it may be worth exploring whether a more integrated approach could simplify operations and strengthen outcomes. At Simco , we work with employers who are ready to reduce complexity, improve alignment, and build infrastructure that supports growth rather than slows it down. The hidden costs of fragmentation rarely show up all at once, but addressing them intentionally can create measurable impact across your organization.

Have a question? Get in touch.