FMLA Compliance Snapshot
March 24, 2023
*For employers with over 50 full-time or full-time equivalents (FTE) employees
FMLA: Employee Notice of Leave
The federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) requires covered employers to provide eligible employees with unpaid, job-protected leave for qualifying reasons. Under the law, employees must provide employers with notice of their need for FMLA leave.
Content of an Employee’s Notice
An employee’s notice of a need for FMLA leave may be oral or written. The first time the employee requests leave for a qualifying reason, they are not required to mention the FMLA. However, they must provide enough information for the employer to know the leave may be covered by the FMLA.
Notice of Foreseeable Leave
Generally, an employee must give at least 30 days’ advance notice of the need to take FMLA leave when he or she knows about the need for the leave in advance and it is possible and practical to do so. If an employee fails to meet this requirement, the employer may delay the FMLA leave for 30 days after they receive notice. For foreseeable leave, the employee must also indicate when and how much leave is needed.
Notice of Unforeseeable Leave
When the need for leave is unexpected, the employee must provide notice as soon as possible and practical. It should usually be reasonable for the employee to provide notice of leave that is unforeseeable within the time required by the employer’s usual and customary notice requirements. Whether the employee’s notice of unforeseeable leave is timely will depend on the facts of the situation.
Notice of Leave for a Qualifying Military Exigency
Employees must give notice of the need for FMLA leave for a qualifying exigency of a military family member as soon as possible and practical, regardless of how far in advance the leave is needed.
Employer’s Usual Policies
- In general, employers may require employees to comply with their usual and customary policies for requesting leave unless unusual circumstances prevent the employee from doing so.
- The employer can take action under its internal rules and procedures if the employee fails to follow its usual and customary rules for requesting leave.
Planned Medical Treatment
- When planning medical treatment, the employee must consult with the employer and make a reasonable effort to schedule the treatment so as not to unduly disrupt the employer's operations, subject to the approval of the health care provider.
FMLA: Serious Health Condition
The federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) requires covered employers to provide eligible employees with unpaid, job-protected leave for qualifying reasons. Qualifying reasons include needing time off due to the employee’s own serious health condition and caring for a spouse, son, daughter or parent who has a serious health condition.
Serious Health Condition
A serious health condition is an illness, injury, impairment, or physical or mental condition that involves inpatient care or continuing treatment by a health care provider. It does not include routine medical examinations, such as a physical, or common medical conditions, such as an upset stomach, unless complications develop.
Types of Serious Health Conditions
Inpatient care means an overnight stay in a hospital, hospice or residential medical care facility and any period of incapacity or subsequent treatment in connection with the overnight stay. Health conditions are also considered serious if they require continuing treatment by a health care provider. Such conditions include:
- Incapacity plus treatment involving a period of incapacity of more than three consecutive, full calendar days, with follow-up treatment;
- Any period of incapacity due to pregnancy or prenatal care;
- ·Any period of incapacity due to a chronic serious health condition requiring health care provider visits at least twice a year and recurring over an extended period;
- A period of incapacity due to a permanent or long-term condition for which treatment may not be effective but requires the continuing supervision of a health care provider; and
- Conditions requiring multiple treatments, which specifically include surgery after an accident or other injury, or a condition that would likely result in incapacity of more than three days without treatment.
Incapacity
- Inability to work, including being unable to perform any one of the essential functions of the employee’s position; or
- Inability to attend school or perform other regular daily activities due to the serious health condition, treatment of the serious health condition, or recovery from the serious health condition.
Incapacity Plus Treatment
Incapacity of more than three consecutive days and subsequent treatment or incapacity relating to the same condition that also involves:
- Two or more in-person visits to a health care provider for treatment within 30 days of the first day of incapacity. The first visit must be within seven days of the first day of incapacity; or
- At least one in-person visit to a health care provider for treatment within seven days of the first day of incapacity, resulting in a regimen of continuing treatment under the health care provider’s supervision.
Sign up for our newsletter.
For many employers, managing a 401(k) plan has become more time-consuming than expected. What should feel like a straightforward administrative process often turns into ongoing coordination between payroll systems, retirement providers, HR teams, and compliance partners. The challenge usually is not the retirement plan itself. More often, the friction comes from the systems and processes supporting it. Manual uploads, delayed updates, repeated reconciliation work, and disconnected data flows can quietly create extra administrative burden over time. Because these issues develop gradually, many organizations begin treating them as “just part of the process.” But they do not have to be. As retirement administration continues to evolve, employers are taking a closer look at the operational side of their plans and asking whether their current processes are truly efficient, scalable, and aligned. Here are five questions worth asking about your organization’s 401(k) administration process. 1. Are We Still Manually Uploading Payroll Files? One of the most common inefficiencies in retirement administration is still surprisingly widespread: manually extracting payroll data and uploading files from one system to another every pay period. While this process may seem manageable, it creates unnecessary administrative work and introduces opportunities for error. Payroll teams often spend time formatting files, validating contribution data, and confirming whether updates were successfully processed. Over time, those extra steps add up. Modern payroll integrations can automate much of this process by securely transferring contribution, eligibility, and employee census data directly between systems. That reduces repetitive manual work while helping ensure retirement information stays current and accurate. If your team still relies heavily on manual uploads each pay cycle, it may be worth evaluating whether your current process is creating more administrative lift than necessary. 2. How Many Systems Need to Be Checked to Confirm an Update Went Through? This is where many employers begin to feel the operational strain of disconnected systems. An employee updates their deferral amount. A payroll change is processed. A loan repayment adjustment is made. Then someone has to verify whether the update actually flowed correctly between platforms. In environments where systems are not fully connected, HR and payroll teams often become the “checkpoint” between vendors, manually confirming updates and troubleshooting discrepancies after the fact. This is also where the difference between one-way and two-way integrations becomes important. A one-way, or 180° integration, typically sends payroll information outward to the retirement provider but does not automatically sync updates back into the payroll or HCM system . A two-way, or 360° integration, allows updates to move between systems automatically, helping reduce duplicate work and missed changes. The less time teams spend double-checking systems, the more time they can spend supporting employees and broader business priorities. 3. Could We Easily Pull Accurate Data for Compliance Testing and Reporting? Retirement plans operate within a highly regulated environment, and compliance depends heavily on accurate, timely data. Annual testing and reporting often require employers to provide detailed information including compensation data, contribution amounts, hire dates, demographic information, eligibility records, and more. For organizations using disconnected systems, collecting that information can become a time-intensive process. Missing fields, outdated data, or formatting inconsistencies often lead to repeated file requests and last-minute corrections during annual testing periods. This creates stress not only for HR and payroll teams, but also for plan administrators, TPAs, and recordkeepers responsible for maintaining compliance standards. Integrated payroll and retirement systems help streamline this process by automatically capturing and syncing data throughout the year, improving visibility and reducing the need for manual data gathering when reporting deadlines approach. 4. How Much Time Is HR Spending Fixing Preventable Errors? Many retirement administration issues do not start as major problems. More often, they begin as small discrepancies that require manual follow-up, whether it is a contribution that does not align with payroll data, an incorrect eligibility date, a delayed deferral update, or an incomplete census file. On their own, these issues may seem relatively minor. Over time, however, they create a significant amount of reactive work for HR and payroll teams that are left validating information, correcting inconsistencies, and coordinating between systems and providers. What makes this especially frustrating is that many of these issues are preventable. They are often the result of disconnected systems, delayed synchronization, or processes that rely too heavily on manual intervention. When teams spend large portions of their time validating data, reconciling discrepancies, and coordinating between providers, it becomes harder to focus on strategic priorities like employee engagement, workforce planning, and benefits strategy. Reducing friction behind the scenes can have a meaningful impact on both operational efficiency and the employee experience. 5. Is Our Current Process Built to Scale as We Grow? Processes that work for a smaller workforce can quickly become difficult to manage as an organization grows. More employees mean more payroll activity, more contribution data, more eligibility tracking, and more opportunities for inconsistencies across systems. Without connected infrastructure, administrative complexity tends to grow alongside headcount. That is why many employers are reevaluating whether their current retirement administration processes are sustainable long term. The goal is not simply to “manage” the workload, but to create systems that scale efficiently without increasing manual effort at the same pace. Connected payroll, HR, and retirement systems can help organizations reduce administrative burden, improve accuracy, and create a more streamlined experience for both employers and employees. A More Connected Approach to Retirement Administration A well-run 401(k) plan should not require constant oversight to function smoothly. When payroll, HR, and retirement administration systems work together, organizations gain better visibility into data, fewer manual touchpoints, improved reporting efficiency, and greater confidence in their processes overall. At Simco , we help employers simplify workforce management by aligning payroll, HR, benefits, and retirement administration through more connected systems and support models. For organizations evaluating their current retirement administration process, sometimes the most valuable first step is simply asking the right questions. Looking Ahead Retirement administration will likely continue becoming more data-driven, integrated, and compliance-focused in the years ahead. Employers that take time now to evaluate how information flows between payroll, HR, and retirement systems will be better positioned to reduce operational friction, support employees more effectively, and scale with greater confidence over time.
Living in the Finger Lakes, especially throughout Canandaigua and Ontario County, offers a quality of life that is hard to match. The lakes, the landscape, and the changing seasons are part of what makes this area special. Those same characteristics, however, also create very specific risks to your home and property. Many of these risks are not fully understood until a loss occurs. This overview is meant to help bring clarity before that happens. Heavy Rain and Flooding: A Common Misunderstanding Spring in our region often brings a combination of heavy rainfall and saturated ground, sometimes alongside lingering snowmelt. When the ground can no longer absorb water, it finds its way into basements and lower levels. What many homeowners do not realize: • Standard homeowners insurance does not cover flood damage • Sewer or drain backup coverage is not automatically included • Even minor water intrusion can result in significant repair costs Flooding remains one of the most common and misunderstood gaps in coverage. Summer Storms and Wind Damage Severe weather events have become more frequent and more intense in recent years. Across the Finger Lakes, we regularly see: • Trees falling onto homes or structures • Roof and siding damage from high winds • Power surges impacting appliances and electronics While many of these losses are typically covered, there are important considerations: • Tree removal coverage is often limited • Poorly maintained trees can create complications in claims • Deductibles may be higher than expected, especially for wind-related losses Tornado Activity in Upstate New York Tornadoes are not something most people associate with our region, but they do happen in upstate New York. They are often smaller in scale, but still strong enough to damage roofs, garages, sheds, outbuildings, and surrounding property. In many cases, tornado-related damage is covered under a standard homeowners policy. The bigger concern is whether homeowners have reviewed their limits, deductibles, and property details before a loss occurs. Hail Damage: Often Overlooked Hail damage does not always present itself immediately. Over time, it can: • Compromise roofing materials • Reduce the lifespan of your roof • Lead to leaks or structural issues later on An important detail many homeowners are unaware of: some policies now settle roof claims based on actual cash value rather than full replacement cost, which can significantly reduce claim payouts. Lakefront and Hillside Exposures The natural features that define the Finger Lakes also introduce unique risks: • Shoreline erosion • Slope instability • Ground shifting following heavy rain It is important to understand: • Land itself is not insurable • Earth movement, including landslides, is typically excluded These are among the most significant uncovered exposures in our area. Lightning and Power Surges A single storm can damage electronics, appliances, and home office equipment. While coverage may apply, it is often subject to policy limits, deductibles, and specific conditions. If you work from home or rely on expensive electronics, it is worth reviewing how your policy handles power surge damage before you need to file a claim. What Homeowners Often Learn Too Late After working through claims with families across the region, a consistent pattern emerges: “I thought that was covered.” “No one explained that to me.” “I wish I had reviewed this sooner.” Insurance is not just about having a policy in place. It is about understanding how that policy responds in real-world situations. A Local Approach to Reviewing Your Coverage As part of the Finger Lakes community, we believe homeowners should have a clear understanding of their coverage before they need to rely on it. We offer straightforward, no-pressure coverage reviews that include: • A clear explanation of your current policy • Identification of potential gaps based on local risks • Honest answers to your questions • Guidance on whether any adjustments make sense for your situation Looking Ahead Seasonal weather in the Finger Lakes is predictable in one sense: it will come. The better question is whether your coverage reflects the realities of where you live. Taking the time to review now can help ensure you are prepared when it matters most.
April is Financial Literacy Month, and most of the conversation tends to focus on individuals. Budgeting, saving, managing debt, planning for retirement. All important topics, but often framed as personal responsibilities. What gets overlooked is how much of an employee’s financial life is shaped at work. From how pay is structured, to how benefits are communicated, to whether retirement options are understood or even used, employers have a direct influence on how confident and informed employees feel about their finances. It is not always intentional, but it is significant. Where Financial Literacy Shows Up at Work For many employees, the workplace is the primary place where financial decisions are made or reinforced. Think about what flows through an employer: Paychecks and how they are calculated Tax withholdings and deductions Health insurance contributions Retirement plan participation and employer match Bonuses, commissions, and variable compensation These are not small details. They are the building blocks of how employees understand their income, manage expenses, and plan for the future. When those elements are clear and easy to navigate, employees tend to feel more in control. When they are confusing or inconsistent, it can lead to frustration, disengagement, or avoidable financial stress. The Reality: Many Employees Are Still Guessing Even in well-run organizations, it is common for employees to have gaps in understanding. Questions like: “Why did my paycheck change this period?” “What exactly is being deducted from my pay?” “Am I contributing enough to my 401(k)?” “How does my health plan actually impact my out-of-pocket costs?” These are not uncommon, and they are not always asked out loud. When employees are unsure, they often make assumptions or avoid decisions altogether. That might mean underutilizing benefits, delaying retirement contributions, or feeling less confident about their financial situation overall. Why This Matters More Than It Seems Financial literacy is not just a personal issue. It has a direct impact on the workplace, and employees who feel financially uncertain are more likely to: Experience stress that carries into the workday Be distracted or less engaged Delay important decisions like retirement planning Ask more reactive questions that take time to address On the other hand, when employees understand how their pay and benefits work, there is a noticeable shift. Communication becomes easier. Trust increases. Fewer issues escalate into larger problems. It is not about expecting employees to become financial experts. It is about creating an environment where information is clear and decisions feel manageable. Where Employers Have the Most Influence Employers do not need to overhaul their entire approach to make an impact. In many cases, financial clarity improves when existing processes are just a little more intentional. A few areas tend to have the biggest influence: Payroll Transparency Pay statements should be easy to read and consistent. Employees should be able to quickly understand their gross pay, deductions, and net pay without needing to ask for clarification every time something changes. Even small improvements in how payroll information is presented can reduce confusion. Benefits Communication Open Enrollment is not the only time benefits need explanation. Employees often need reminders and context throughout the year. Clear explanations around what plans cover, how contributions work, and how to use benefits in real scenarios can make a meaningful difference. Retirement Plan Engagement Offering a retirement plan is one thing. Helping employees understand how to use it is another. Employers who provide basic education around contribution levels, employer match, and long-term impact tend to see stronger participation and better outcomes. Consistency Across Systems When payroll, benefits, and HR systems do not align, employees feel it. Conflicting information or multiple places to find answers creates friction. Even if the underlying services are strong, the experience can feel disjointed if everything is not connected. Financial Literacy as a Workplace Advantage Financial Literacy Month is a good reminder that supporting employees in this area is not just a benefit. It is part of how a business operates. Employers who prioritize clarity tend to see: Fewer payroll and benefits questions More confident employees Better utilization of offered benefits Stronger overall engagement It does not require a complete redesign. Often, it is the result of tightening communication, simplifying access to information, and making sure systems are working together. At Simco, this is something we see regularly. When payroll, HR, benefits, and retirement services are aligned, it becomes much easier for employers to provide a clear and consistent experience without adding more administrative burden. A Few Practical Steps to Start With If Financial Literacy Month is a prompt to take action, it does not need to be complicated. A few focused steps can go a long way: Review a sample of employee pay statements and ask if they are easy to understand at a glance Look at how benefits information is shared outside of Open Enrollment and where there may be gaps Check that retirement plan details, including employer match, are clearly communicated and easy to access Identify whether employees have one clear place to go for payroll, benefits, and HR information Ask managers or HR team members what questions they are hearing most often from employees These are simple starting points, but they often reveal where clarity can be improved. Looking Ahead Financial literacy does not need to be a separate initiative. It is already built into the way employers manage pay, benefits, and communication. April is a good reminder to take a closer look at how those pieces are working together. When employees understand their finances at work, they are more confident, more engaged, and better positioned to make informed decisions. That benefits both the individual and the organization over time.
