How Noncompete Agreements Impact Hiring
June 28, 2024
How Noncompete Agreements Impact Hiring

Noncompete agreements are often viewed as a double-edged sword in hiring and employee management. While they may help safeguard proprietary and confidential information, they can pose hiring challenges.


As such, employers must carefully navigate the complexities of noncompete clauses, balancing their protective benefits with the need to maintain a motivated and mobile workforce. As regulatory landscapes evolve, companies may need to reevaluate their reliance on noncompete agreements and explore alternative strategies for safeguarding their competitive interests. This article explores noncompete agreements, their impact on employers and considerations when drafting them.


Overview of Noncompete Agreements

A noncompete agreement, also known as a restrictive covenant agreement, is a contractual term between an employer and a worker. It blocks the employee from working for a competing employer or starting a competing business, typically within a certain geographic area and period of time after their employment ends. These agreements can protect companies from losing valuable employees and confidential information to competitors and help maintain competitive advantages.


Noncompete agreements are more prevalent in industries such as technology, sales and health care, where sensitive information and specialized skills are crucial. However, enforceability varies by jurisdiction.


Noncompete Bans

The enforceability of a noncompete agreement is generally determined by state and local legislatures and courts. Some states impose strict limitations or outright bans on noncompete clauses.


On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) voted to issue a final rule prohibiting employers from entering into or enforcing noncompete clauses with most employees. Scheduled to take effect on Sept. 4, 2024, the final rule applies to noncompete agreements with all current and former workers, whether full-time or part-time, including but not limited to employees, independent contractors, interns, externs and apprentices. However, employers should note that the FTC ban will only prohibit post-employment noncompetes. Employers may still restrict current employees from engaging in competitive activities.


The FTC stated that it aims to promote competition by protecting workers' freedom to change jobs, increasing innovation and fostering new business formation.


The Hiring Impact of Noncompetes

The labor market likely will continue to be competitive. Without a noncompete, workers have more freedom to move to another company in the same industry without legal repercussions. As a result, the fight for talent could get even tougher.


As with any workplace decision, using noncompete agreements comes with advantages and drawbacks. Consider the following pros of noncompetes as they relate to employee attraction and retention:


  • Increased employee retention—Noncompetes discourage employees from leaving the organization and working for competitors, which can result in lower turnover rates. Organizations invest heavily in their workers, including onboarding, learning and professional development resources.


  • Maintained competitive advantage—Noncompetes aim to protect sensitive business information, including trade secrets and customer base. Organizational success will likely be achieved by safeguarding company information and relationships that differentiate them from the competition. As such, top talent wants to work for a leading company.


Conversely, here are some talent-related cons of noncompetes for companies to consider:


  • Deterrent to candidates—Job candidates may have concerns about the necessity of noncompetes, causing them to remove themselves from consideration or reject offers.


  • Increased legal liability and costs—Noncompetes are employment contracts with complex rules. Organizations that impose unfair restrictions could face employee lawsuits. Additionally, it can be costly for employers to enforce such agreements. Employee lawsuits also have the potential to damage the employer’s reputation, impacting attraction and retention.


Employer Considerations

First, employers should consider whether a noncompete agreement is legally enforceable in their state. Legal counsel can advise employers on how enforceable a noncompete agreement would be in the company’s location and industry.


Employers can also assess any industry-specific concerns. For example, companies with patented technologies or workers in sales roles may use noncompete agreements. Organizations can also research whether industry competitors require noncompetes with their employees to strengthen attraction and retention efforts. It can be beneficial to remain consistent with the industry, which levels the playing field when competing for talent.


Aside from legality, employers can also consider if noncompete agreements are fair and reasonable to departing employees. When employees who have signed a noncompete leave the company for another job, it’s important for the agreement not to hinder their ability to make a living. Employees may take a new job for many reasons, such as a career progression the current employer couldn’t offer, greater compensation and a more suitable location. Employers should review the terms of their noncompetes to ensure fairness even if the employee is moving to a competitor.


Lastly, being upfront about whether an organization requires new hires to sign noncompete agreements is important. Include that information in job postings or communicate it immediately with candidates so the clause doesn’t become an issue later in the interview or hiring process. Companies may lose good candidates due to noncompetes, but it’s better to have the conversation early on to avoid wasting the time of candidates and recruiting teams. Employers may also keep candidates formerly employed by competitors in the pipeline and reconnect with them after their noncompete has expired.


Summary

Employers need to take many considerations into account before implementing a noncompete agreement while also staying up to date on the latest rules and laws. Furthermore, since noncompete agreements are often the subject of litigation, employers should consult their legal counsel before making any decisions.


Contact Simco for more workplace guidance.

Sign up for our newsletter.

2026 Retirement Plan Contribution Limits Raised by IRS: Key Updates for 401(k) and More

November 20, 2025
The IRS recently announced the updated retirement plan contribution limits for 2026, reflecting cost-of-living adjustments and new guidance under the SECURE 2.0 Act. Whether you’re an employer managing a company plan or an employee planning for your future, these changes are important to understand so you can make the most of your retirement savings. Key Increases for 2026 Some of the most notable updates for defined contribution plans, including 401(k), 403(b), and 457(b) plans, are summarized in the chart below: 

The Employer's Guide to 2026 Minimum Wage Updates

November 5, 2025
As we move into 2026, employers across many states and localities are preparing for significant minimum wage increases. Nearly 20 states and more than 40 local jurisdictions will raise their wage thresholds effective January 1, 2026. This poses important planning, budgeting, and compliance considerations, especially for mid-sized employers like those that partner with Simco, where payroll, HR, benefits and advisory services intersect. Below we’ve summarized key state and local minimum wage updates and outlined the steps you should take now to stay ahead of the changes and mitigate risk. State-Level Minimum Wage Increases (January 1, 2026) The table below highlights selected state increases scheduled for January 1, 2026.

The Benefits of Outsourcing HR: Save Time, Cut Costs, and Boost Engagement

October 24, 2025
When HR Is Overloaded, Your Business Feels It For many small to mid-sized businesses, HR is one of the most critical (and most overextended) functions. From payroll and benefits to onboarding and compliance reporting, administrative tasks can quickly consume your team’s time, leaving little room for strategic work that actually moves the business forward. Sound familiar? You’re not alone. A recent survey from Champions of Change: isolved’s Fourth-Annual HR Leaders’ Research Study found that 51% of HR leaders spend four or more hours a day answering repetitive questions. This time could be better spent on employee engagement, culture, and growth initiatives. When HR teams are pulled in too many directions, the consequences ripple across the entire organization, resulting in missed deadlines, frustrated staff, compliance risks, and ultimately, higher turnover. Why HR Leaders Consider Outsourcing Outsourcing HR isn’t just for businesses without dedicated HR teams. In fact, a survey of 1,000 HR decision-makers found that 76% could benefit from outsourcing certain tasks, even though only 54% currently have plans to do so. HR outsourcing allows organizations to offload both core and strategic tasks, including payroll, benefits administration, recruitment, onboarding, compliance support, performance management, employee relations, and workforce analytics, without adding headcount. This augmentation provides a multiplier effect: a small HR team can function like a much larger one, accomplishing more in less time. By leveraging experienced HR professionals through outsourcing, organizations can free up internal HR teams to focus on initiatives that directly impact business growth, such as talent development, employee engagement, and culture-building. Routine administrative tasks, when handled externally, no longer distract from these high-value priorities. The True Cost of Administrative Overload Overburdened HR teams don’t just affect your internal operations; they impact your employees’ experience. Inconsistent onboarding can create a rocky first impression for new hires. Delayed payroll or benefits questions lead to frustration and decreased trust. Compliance oversights expose your business to fines and legal risk. Even small inefficiencies add up. According to the National Association of Professional Employer Organizations (NAPEO), organizations that leverage an outsourced HR model achieve an average ROI of 27.2% per year, saving around $1,775 per employee while paying $1,395 per employee for outsourced services. That’s not just cost savings, it’s a reinvestment in your team and your business. The Power of Strategic HR Outsourcing Outsourcing doesn’t mean giving up control or handing HR off to a faceless provider. Done strategically, it’s about extending your team. Administrative tasks like payroll, benefits, onboarding, and reporting can be handled efficiently by experts, while HR teams gain confidence that compliance requirements are being met. Most importantly, it frees internal HR to pivot from reactive, day-to-day tasks toward engagement, culture-building, and retention strategies. Outsourced HR support can scale with your business, providing additional expertise during busy periods, leaves of absence, or rapid growth phases. The impact is clear. Teams feel supported, employees feel heard, and the organization operates smarter, not harder. With the right outsourcing partner, a small HR team can act like a team of 10, and a team of five can perform like a team of 25, all while maintaining compliance and efficiency. Retention Starts With the Right Employee Experience When administrative burdens are reduced, HR teams can focus on creating meaningful experiences for employees. Transparent processes around pay, benefits, and policies build trust. Faster, more organized onboarding leaves a strong first impression. Access to modern self-service HCM tools empowers employees to manage their own information, reducing repetitive questions and improving engagement. By leveraging experienced HR professionals to handle gaps in internal processes, organizations can enhance overall employee satisfaction, ensuring every interaction, from onboarding to open enrollment, feels seamless and supportive. A Smarter Approach to HR Means a Stronger Business Across industries, companies are recognizing that HR outsourcing is no longer a luxury. It’s a strategic advantage. Organizations that adopt a blended model of technology and advisory support report measurable reductions in administrative workload, cost savings compared to maintaining fully in-house HR teams, and improved engagement for employees. Strategic HR outsourcing allows internal teams to shift from transactional tasks to big-picture initiatives, creating a more resilient, efficient, and high-performing workforce. At the end of the day, HR isn’t just a function; it’s the backbone of your organization. When it’s overextended, the entire business suffers. But with the right support, HR teams can focus on meaningful initiatives, employees feel more valued, and the business benefits from measurable ROI. Strategic HR outsourcing isn’t about replacing your team, it’s about empowering it. Your people, your culture, and your bottom line all benefit. Curious how Simco's HR Advisory services can help your business? Let's talk today.

Have a question? Get in touch.